[geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
(N) Surely you are not saying that God placed Hitler, Lenin, Pol Pot, Amin,
Mugabe, Stalin, Bush, Blair, etc., in power? Do we not need to understand what
"the powers that be are ordained of God? means, rather than just take it as it
first appears?
(A) Surely you are not saying that these governments were less righteous than
any of the developing countries whose governments allow the murder of 46
million babies a year,126000 per day in the US alone since 1976??. 40 million.
This is just the Abortion murders??Do you really think Hitler or Paul pot were
in any less of God?s favor. ??????.Hitler only slaughtered 6 million Jews and
he didn?t do all the killing in the war??.How is tolerating them any less
Culpable. Most people who use this kind of argument just want to either explain
away what they don?t understand ? or Just want to blame God for the evil..
?.
The short answer to your emotional argument is YES!??.Why??..
Romans 8: 28. And we know that ALL THINGS work together FOR THE GOOD TO THEM
THAT LOVE GOD, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
Matthew 13:41. The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall
gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do
iniquity;????.Until then God is not forcing evil from the earth? he is giving
everyone the opportunity to make a choice trust him or else, which comes
latter????.
MY PERSONAL FAVORITE ?..the one that gives me the most comfort
2Corinthians 10: 6. And having in a readiness to REVENGE all disobedience, WHEN
YOUR OBEDIENCE IS FULFILLED???????????.Romans 13:19. Beloved, do not avenge
yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, "Vengeance is
Mine, I will repay,'' says the Lord. ?????????? People are so worried about the
evil of others?..the speck in Hitters eye while ignoring the plank in our
own?.. this argument does not invalidate the plain word of God, who said He
ordained them or what ever your translation states??????.It is not our problem
to worry about the governments our job is????.
Matthew 28:18. And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, ALL POWER is given
unto me in heaven and in earth. 19. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost: 20. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you:
and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen????..God is
working his plan not mine or yours?? I don?t understand everything but if I did
then I would be God. This is not my place, my place is to trust in him and his
word. He will take care of Hitter, Paul pot, us and the abortionist too???.in
his time, his way, not ours. How is tolerating them any less Culpable. Most
people who use this kind of argument just want to either explain away what they
don?t understand ? ????..
2 Peter 2:9. Then the Lord knows how to "deliver the godly" out of temptations
and to "reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment," 10. and
especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and
despise authority. They are presumptuous, self-willed; they are not afraid to
speak evil of dignitaries, 11. whereas angels, who are greater in power and
might, do not bring a reviling accusation against them before the Lord. 12. But
these, like natural brute beasts made to be caught and destroyed, "speak evil
of the things they do not understand," and will utterly perish in their own
corruption, ????.
?????????. or Just want to blame God for the evil.
(N)How about different translations of the same Scriptures? Do we try and
understand them, or do we just read them? When translating from one language to
another, it is the meaning that is of the utmost importance, not the direct,
word-for-word translation.
(A)The scripture says the same thing in your native language as it does in the
original?..that is not to say that they all use the same words but the context
of all Scripture will yield exactly the same meaning. And if it does not, then
it is not the word of God it would then be a product of man??This is only a
problem for those who put there trust in man to have preserved his word. Mine
is in God, I believe that he has preserved it. Those who try to convince you
other wise do not know anything about translations or scripture! Every single
verse we have is handed down there are no originals of any scripture or letters
anywhere. I challenge anyone to show me one. There are however a lot of people
trying to prop them selves up as learned scholarly individuals?saying that well
it doesn?t mean that, or it rely means something other than what it plainly
states?.?. Who told them that? ??.It was not God, He never told anyone that?.
..That is the pure and vain imagination of men!?...
But
here is what he did say?..Galatians 1: 8. But even if we, or an angel from
heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let
him be accursed ????Now how can you do that if it cannot be understood and he
tells you not to think beyond what is written????Only if your faith is in God
providence absolutely???.. Colossians 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through
philosophy and EMPTY DECEIT, according to the tradition of men, according to
the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. ???? you can
find anyone claiming to be Christian who will take any position you want and
tell you and mean it that they are following scripture??? God made man gave man
language, gave man the ability to read, what he wrote?.. He knows exactly what
it means to you and me and only by faith in God can you call ANY scripture
anywhere God?s word. I challenge anyone to show me where other than by faith.
The ONLY problem is not my interpretation or yours or "how
do I
read it" ?. Only will you accept what he plainly said or will you chose to
adopt some methodology or hermeneutic not even mentioned in scripture, as the
"correct way" for understanding? ?????? The Test? Show me where I have not
spoken as the oracles of God or where God said that he did not intend it that
way. If you can not do so, the problem is not with how to read scripture, it is
with men?s willingness to accept ONLY what it says, because all provisions of
scripture are/were provide by God. Otherwise who is to say what is and is not
scripture? And any interpretation will do, I mean what?s the standard??..
People have it and the standard! Tey chose the "reasoning of men" over plain
text.
"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Allen,
I reply as follows to one of your main arguments:
(N) ?I certainly do not accept that they are appointed by Him.?
(A) Mathew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given
unto me in heaven and in earth.& Romans 13: 1. Let every soul be subject unto
the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are
?ordained of God?. Romans 13: 2. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power,
?resisteth the ordinance of God?: and they that resist shall receive to
themselves damnation. I?m not sure how anyone can maintain that position.
[N] Surely you are not saying that God placed Hitler, Lenin, Pol Pot, Amin,
Mugabe, Stalin, Bush, Blair, etc., in power? Do we not need to understand what
"the powers that be are ordained of God? means, rather than just take it as it
first appears? How about different translations of the same Scriptures? Do we
try and understand them, or do we just read them? When translating from one
language to another, it is the meaning that is of the utmost importance, not
the direct, word-for-word translation.
Neville.
---------------------------------
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with
Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
- Follow-Ups:
- [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Allen Daves
- [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Dr. Neville Jones
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- » [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Allen Daves
- [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Dr. Neville Jones