[geocentrism] Re: The Trinity

Jack,

The problem is not mine the problem is that people dont understand the 
significane of the fact that  scriptures do not use the term 
trinity..never!...We are not to think beyond what is written period... ok fine 
different lanugages but trinity is just a name of a concept (that we are 
ignorant of) that is never defined in the text of what is written!... The 
scriptures nowhere at any time or any combination of scriptures explicetly 
detail for us where Jesus begins and the Holy Spirit ends.....Therefore the 
word trinity is not only 
1.A fabricated word, but also a word that can only describe our ingnorance of a 
concpet about the nature of God .......not objectively define that nature of 
God....!?
2. As such the term Trinity is very vauge in relation to the nature of God  by 
defintion of vauge...............Scripture does not detail that bit of the 
exact nature of God  where Jesus the father and the Holy Spirit end or begin 
with or withint each other... you connot invent words to name a concepts that 
you do not understand or are not defined......and call it "spelled out"......



----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: The Trinity

Allen,
The references to the Trinity are not in the least vague. One of Neville's 
problems, and I'm begining to think yours too, is because the word 'Trinity' is 
not mentioned in the Bible. The book that Neville destroyed said it all by 
showing all the scriptures related to every combination of God, Spirit and 
Jesus. There is no doubt whatsoever. Since Neville rejects the Bible anything 
he has to say on the subject can be ignored.

Jack 


Neville Jones wrote: 


-----Original Message-----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:56:04 -0700 (PDT)


Read carefully..Iʼm not anti- "Trinity"....................There are many 
analogies and similitudes regarding the Trinity and I think for the most part 
they are adequate. I will say, I personally donʼt like using the word coz it is 
not found anywhere in scripture. Agreed.  ... What is found in the scripture is 
a vague concept. It is that vague concept that we call "the trinity". But the 
text does not detail that concept nor does it ever mention any term with 
intrinsic meaning to refer to that vague concept except perhaps "us" and "One 
God". Agreed. This is part of the problem. We invent words that could only get 
any valid meaning from vague concepts found only from a source that does not 
bother to divulge that information and yet we still insist on assigning our 
invented words/ concepts with intrinsic, absolute values. We ge so caught up in 
our adhoc words that we loose sight of what we are given specifically. ...
Neville.

Other related posts: