[geocentrism] Re: The Moon Generates its Own Light!

That seems like a very reasonable argument, Phil. Please let me know if
someone does the Math? I'll see if I can find it on the Internet.

Regards,
John

On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>  There is NOT such a thing as a flying pink unicorn.  says Bernie
>
> Not in the same league..  You cannot be absolutely sure of that Bernie.
>
>  The conventional explanation for moonlight being simply sunlight
> reflected off a convex spherical surface is inadequate for describing what
> we see."
> It's by a Dr. Neville T. Jones, Ph.D.
>
> I said at the first time I read this, and see no reason to change opinion,
> and repeat it here. with all due respect for Neville.
>
> Even though I have not the level of mathmatical competence. It seems
> reasonably certain that the angles of incidence over a convex reflector have
> a sinewave configuration (graphically)  .. Meaning that though the angle of
> reflection reduces the intensity per degree at a sine rate (for a perfect
> circle) the overall area from which the reflection comes is greater, and
> increasing the further away from peak centre to the edge we go.  Thus the
> over all reflected light will have an even iintensity overall equivalent to
> a flat plate of the same apparent diameter.
>
> Another way to assist my rather difficult explanation is this. Consider how
> much light would be reflected or is available, if the total area of the
> convex body was flattened out. We would have a much larger disc that what is
> observed.
>
> I had applied this reasoning to a problem of my fixed flat solar panels,
> producing very low output in the morning compared to Midday. IF I HAD
> mounted PANELS IN A CONVEX TUBULAR SHAPE (inverse parabola) the total output
> would be constant over the complete day..  Of course an inefficient way of
> achieving what a rotating structure to follow the sun would do, but not if
> solar cells cost nothing.
>
> Philip.
> PS  It occurred to me, as I re-read Nevilles page, that his argument should
> also apply to the earth. Yet as all photos show, the earth likewise exhibits
> an evenly lighted disc, just like all the planets. and suns.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:25 AM
> *Subject:* [geocentrism] Re: The Moon Generates its Own Light!
>
>   Philip,
>
> There is NOT such a thing as a flying pink unicorn. In addition
> have you seen this?:
> "Conclusion
> The conventional explanation for moonlight being simply sunlight reflected
> off a convex spherical surface is inadequate for describing what we see."
> It's by a Dr. Neville T. Jones, Ph.D.
> http://www.realityreviewed.com/Moon%20Illumination.htm
>
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 1/2/09, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>
> From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: The Moon Generates its Own Light!
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Friday, January 2, 2009, 12:35 PM
>
>  Bernie the world is NOT  flat. And unless there is some volcanic
> activity, which is doubtful, there is NO electromagnetic radiation emanating
> from the moon, other than that reflected or redirected from the sun.
>
> Also reading your exerpts it seems to me that your book of Enoch has been
> re modeled or touched up by some modernist author.
>
> Phil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 03, 2009 5:03 AM
> *Subject:* [geocentrism] The Moon Generates its Own Light!
>
>    *            The Moon Generates its own Light!*
> **
>
> *Genesis 1:16 - "And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule
> the day,*
>
> *and the lesser light to rule the night . . . "**
>
> *
>
> <http://sites.google.com/site/earthdeception/Home/moonlight.bmp?attredirects=0>
>
>  **
>
> * The Book of Enoch ( non-Canonical ) - Astronomy - Moon - Chapter 78 -
> excerpts:*
> *" . . . his [ the Sun's ] light is sevenfold brighter than that of the
> Moon; but as regards size they are both equal."
>
> "And Uriel showed me another law: when light is transferred to the moon,
> and on which side it is transferred to her by the sun.** During all the
> period during which the Moon is growing in her light, she is transferring it
> to herself when opposite to the sun during fourteen days her light is
> accomplished in the heaven, and when she is illumined throughout, her light
> is accomplished full in the heaven."**
>
> " . . . and by day she [ the Moon ] appears like the heaven, and there 
> isnothing else in
> her save her light."
>
> More* *HERE. <http://www.ecmarsh.com/crl/enoch/enoch1_03.htm>*
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: