[geocentrism] Re: The Heart

Steven, as I sat at the table a moment ago, looking down at my adoring dog with 
all the devotion showing in her eyes, I realised that I had mislead you all a 
bit. OH yes I can get quite palpitated over my dog, should she get sick, or 
gets mistreated.. I feel for any stray or mistreated animal, and the dooers 
will get quite an emotional angry reaction from me. 

I do not feel the same way about children..  or people in general . After all 
they are not dumb animals, and they are either with God, or doomed to Hell as 
His enemy. For them I reserve a cold charity, in letting them know truth that 
they may accept or reject.. They have a free will..  If they go to Hell I 
acknowledge the resignation of God, as did Jesu with Judas..  I know that if I 
am responsible for their loss then I must accept the price tag as an act of the 
will.. 

I am required to and would regret my guilt, repentance, but that is not 
remorse, which the dictionary defines as deep sorrow a feeling..  Feelings 
cannot be willed..  a contradiction in terms. God specifically requires 
repentance and change for forgiveness, not remorse, even though the word sorrow 
is often misapplied as meaning remorse..  So many words of our language are 
misleading like that. 

I'm sure God did not intend charity to mean bribing someone to come to Him. Yet 
so many times it is applied that way..  

Philip.   
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steven Jones 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:43 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: The Heart


  Just my opinion, but I think women can be much more advanced than men when  
  willing to accept what the heart says, or emotions in general. Men think  
  they can’t cry in public, why not? Because it’s not macho? Macho has  
  created a lot of trouble in the world, take a look at the way women are  
  treated in Mexico “Women in Pain: Gender and Morbidity in Mexico” (Kaja  
  Finkler, University of Pennsylvania Press, February 19, 1994).

  Jesus cried in public. Period.

  Steven.


  On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:30:56 +0100, Steven Jones <midclyth@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
  wrote:

  > Dear Phillip,
  >
  > I don’t believe the heart is merely glands dictating to our minds, and I  
  > think it extremely unhealthy to suppress the heart. The mind cannot  
  > reason everything, we should be open to God’s direction too. Your  
  > statement about the heart leading to killing things or people who get in  
  > the way is not necessarily true. It is compassion, and hence, the heart,  
  > which can lead to, the correct decisions in many circumstances. What  
  > about the bombers who carried out instructions and burned Dresden to the  
  > ground, where was their heart? They were running on intellect alone,  
  > albeit a corrupted one, but they did not reason with the gift of feeling.
  >
  > Strange, I have a correspondent who told me an opposite view to your  
  > correspondent, that I should be less emotional and run more on  
  > intellect, but I am happy with who I am, I can’t change the emotions,  
  > they are useful and open up many things. I’m happy with a spiritual side.
  >
  > This is an extremely deep topic I think, if you want to continue to  
  > discuss it feel free, I’m ready for the challenge.
  >
  > Best wishes,
  >
  > Steven.
  >
  >
  > On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:40:58 +0100, philip madsen  
  > <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  >
  >> Nice letter Steven.. Mind you I had tongue in cheek on the floating  
  >> dinosaurs..  Maybe I should have used a crocodile rather than a  
  >> Lizard.. So in practical terms all the dinos if there were any, died  
  >> with the flood.  Then there is the evidence of the frozen mastodons in  
  >> Siberia...  allegedly extinct 10,000years ago.
  >>
  >> Steven I have another correspondent who is always on about " the heart"  
  >> which I interpret as emotionally inclined. Their heart rules their  
  >> head.....  glands rule the Brain.  I consider this to be a racial  
  >> trait. Huns (I must descend from them) can control this weakness.  
  >> Latins , cannot, and always react in an uncontrollable way, sometimes  
  >> killing things or people who get in the way. Maybe Arabs jews and  
  >> blacks likewise.
  >>
  >> I was trained from birth to kill the heart, and resist even the  
  >> slightest tendency to display such a weakness as emotion.. Its always  
  >> been easy. The true meaning of heart in spiritual terms is the soul as  
  >> "centre" of the human psyche, and this can be controlled or affected by  
  >> the glands of emotion, or the will of the mind. It is only through this  
  >> latter action that charitas, (love of God) can be truely attained, and  
  >> must come first, before any charism, if allowed , can be deserved.
  >>
  >> But not entirely...  I have no argument with the emotional heights one  
  >> can reach when listening to Verdi, my favourite of the classics..  Not  
  >> to mention of course those stirring German beer drinking songs..  which  
  >> make me friendly with all my enemies, after the beer of course..
  >>
  >> Philip.
  >>
  >>
  >>   ----- Original Message -----
  >>   From: Steven Jones
  >>   To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >>   Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 5:45 AM
  >>   Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Dinosaurs
  >>
  >>
  >>   Flood like conditions that you say a dinosaur could ride out for a  
  >> year:
  >>
  >>   http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=F3_u5KrcsPQ
  >>
  >>   Here a cruise liner (without engines) has entered beam sea, the most
  >>   dangerous sitation for any boat. Bare in mind, this is not a “North
  >>   Atlantic Storm”.
  >>
  >>   Steven.
  >>
  >>   On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:14:51 +0100, Steven Jones  
  >> <midclyth@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  >>   wrote:
  >>
  >>   > Sorry Phillip, but to suggest that dinosaurs didn’t need to board  
  >> the
  >>   > ark because they could survive the ocean is simply untenable. Whilst
  >>   > it’s true modern secular knowledge believes that many species  
  >> bathed in
  >>   > water and even almost totally submersed themselves, it is in much  
  >> the
  >>   > same way that Elephants and Hippopotamus’s do in modern day Africa.  
  >> Put
  >>   > simply, that is to say that they either need a supporting riverbed
  >>   > underneath their feet (security) or they can “paddle” but not for  
  >> long.
  >>   > Take Brachiosaurus for example, coming in at about 35 tonnes
  >>   > (Christiansen 1997), built for land, and a very slow mover, there is
  >>   > simply no way this creatures morphology could cope with being out  
  >> in an
  >>   > ocean for long, ask yourself how long a modern day African elephant
  >>   > would last if air-lifted and placed in the sea? A terrible cruelty  
  >> of
  >>   > course, and instead you expect me to believe that an 82-feet beast  
  >> can
  >>   > ride out the floodwaters for almost a year? What about it’s food?
  >>   > Brachiosaurus ate no fish; his long slender neck was used for pine  
  >> and
  >>   > other type trees, crunching needles and all that with powerful  
  >> molars
  >>   > “built” for such.
  >>   >
  >>   > Regarding developing from a little lizard, sorry too, but there are  
  >> no
  >>   > connection links. We are expected to believe that fish that could  
  >> barely
  >>   > walk would somehow develop into all the vast and complex animal  
  >> types
  >>   > that are dinosaurs? I would be very dubious of a dinosaur missing  
  >> link.
  >>   > There is much forgery in the world of dinosaurs as it is, let alone
  >>   > this. “New” species have already come into being in the past by  
  >> simply
  >>   > mixing and matching bones. Remember too, many of these fossils have  
  >> to
  >>   > be constructed and different constructors will of course have  
  >> different
  >>   > ideas. The bones are not always found in order. Even how they should
  >>   > stand has changed, Iguanodon for example, is a classic  
  >> illustration. I
  >>   > believe the modern view to be correct, but it highlights different
  >>   > interpretations. In short, all of this bone pick-and-mixing is
  >>   > deceiving, and there is no real evidence for any evolution amongst  
  >> the
  >>   > dinosaurs anywhere. I’ve even forgotten to mention the financial  
  >> drive
  >>   > too of putting more “exotic” creatures on displays in the museums  
  >> of the
  >>   > 19th century. The famous “bone wars” of ED Cope and OC Marsh, is a  
  >> great
  >>   > example. Two businessmen shaping American science, with perhaps  
  >> forgery
  >>   > at the best of times, but did it make money? It’s sad when people  
  >> spend
  >>   > their lives studying the fossils of forgery’s, Piltdown man has been
  >>   > shown to be a hoax now say, but for those that studied him? Well,  
  >> they
  >>   > just can’t let go.
  >>   >
  >>   > Open your eyes to divine design Phillip, it’s simple and clear to  
  >> see.
  >>   > And what about the spirit? How do evolutionists explain this? We are
  >>   > according to them only physical, some kind of chemical conglomerate
  >>   > thinking machine, but that is rubbish. We have a heart, a spirit,  
  >> and a
  >>   > soul. My own experiences prove there is a God, but your probably
  >>   > unlikely to receive anything without the right heart. God desires  
  >> each
  >>   > and everyone of us to seek him out and we must be looking in the  
  >> first
  >>   > place. Music to me too is deeply spiritual. And composers have  
  >> always
  >>   > been striving for new sounds and ideas, at the cutting edge of
  >>   > innovation, that innovation did not spring about by chance. Even
  >>   > wind-chimes (which I find annoying anyway) are thought out to be  
  >> less
  >>   > intrusive. It could be a pentatonic scale so the notes are less  
  >> likely
  >>   > to clash, what if it were pure chaos I ask you? Do you think it  
  >> will be
  >>   > worthy of notation?
  >>   >
  >>   > Steven.
  >>   >
  >>   >
  >>   > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:00:29 +0100, philip madsen  
  >> <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  >>   > wrote:
  >>   >
  >>   >> Dinosaurs would not need to have gotten onto the ark now Steven  
  >> would
  >>   >> they?  Wern't they natural water beasts? They could have floated  
  >> around
  >>   >> on the sea eating fish, which likewise suffered little from the  
  >> flood.
  >>   >>
  >>   >> Just wondering.  But then maybe they developed from a little  
  >> lizard,
  >>   >> which Noah could easily have accomodated. You see we can accept  
  >> Darwins
  >>   >> theory, in that Tigers developed after the flood from Mrs. Noah's  
  >> pussy
  >>   >> cat.
  >>   >>
  >>   >> Lets all keep in mind as well that fossil dating is pure guess  
  >> work...
  >>   >>
  >>   >> Philip.
  >>   >> Mastodons
  >>   >> The American mastodon (scientific name Mammut americanum) roamed  
  >> North
  >>   >> America from at least 3.75 million to 11,000 years ago. Mastodons,
  >>   >> along with mammoths and modern elephants, are members of the order
  >>   >> Proboscidea. As adults they stood between 2.5 and 3 meters (8-10  
  >> feet)
  >>   >> at the shoulder and weighed betweeen 3500 and 5400 kilograms (4-6  
  >> tons).
  >>   >>
  >>   >> Mastodons became extinct approximately 11,000 years ago. Today,
  >>   >> paleontologists are trying to understand why.
  >>   >>
  >>   >> But, but but....
  >>   >>
  >>   >>   ----- Original Message -----
  >>   >>   From: Steven Jones
  >>   >>   To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >>   >>   Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 2:39 AM
  >>   >>   Subject: [geocentrism] Dinosaurs
  >>   >>
  >>   >>
  >>   >>   Hi All,
  >>   >>
  >>   >>   Just while we’re touching upon the topic of dinosaurs, I would  
  >> like
  >>   >> to say
  >>   >>   I was once a very big hobbyist concerning them, collecting vast
  >>   >> quantities
  >>   >>   of secular data and both reading and learning it avidly. But,  
  >> times
  >>   >> haves
  >>   >>   changed rathRe: [geocentrism] Re: Evolutioner substantially, I  
  >> was
  >>   >>   significantly younger then and I’ve grown in spirit concerning  
  >> God.
  >>   >> The
  >>   >>   following statement I hope is not too radical, but I have come to
  >>   >> question
  >>   >>   many of the species labeled as "dinosaurs" entirely. After all,  
  >> how
  >>   >> many
  >>   >>   of you have actually seen a real fossilized dinosaur skeleton?  
  >> The
  >>   >> answer
  >>   >>   is probably none, since almost every museum has only plaster  
  >> casts on
  >>   >>   display. This all suggests a rather large mass conspiracy, but  
  >> how do
  >>   >> the
  >>   >>   skeletons look so realistic you ask? It’s often mooted in the  
  >> secular
  >>   >>   world that birds descended the evolutionary path from dinosaurs,  
  >> why
  >>   >> do
  >>   >>   they believe such? It’s simple, because many dinosaur fossils  
  >> have
  >>   >> similar
  >>   >>   structures to birds. Could this not be because the plastercasts  
  >> are
  >>   >> really
  >>   >>   based upon birds in the first place. Meet the real Tyrannosaurus  
  >> rex,
  >>   >>   probably an enlarged chicken skeleton, with a massive skull and  
  >> tail
  >>   >> added
  >>   >>   plus two pointless little arms. This, iconic and typical  
  >> “ultimate”
  >>   >>   monster is so similar to those "classic" beasts and dragons  
  >> dreamed
  >>   >> up by
  >>   >>   man’s imagination that perhaps it is only an element of the
  >>   >> imagination.
  >>   >>   And don’t be fooled into thinking this 5-7 tonne beast is an  
  >> agile
  >>   >> hunter,
  >>   >>   because it does have some serious flaws with it’s morphology. The
  >>   >>   balancing act required for that huge skull, the pointless little  
  >> arms
  >>   >>   which can’t even pick teeth and even the art of getting up after
  >>   >> sleeping
  >>   >>   are all a bit suspicious. Computer models have demonstrated I  
  >> believe
  >>   >> that
  >>   >>   this is not an easy balancing act. Any beast seeing the site of  
  >> those
  >>   >>   teeth coming along would be away as fast as lightning, making  
  >> hunting
  >>   >>   nearly impossible, don't believe 35 mph, sorry, even modern  
  >> results
  >>   >> are
  >>   >>   showing 17.9 mph at best. You'll need RealPlayer for the computer
  >>   >>   simulation video link below:
  >>   >>
  >>   >>    
  >> 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check/player/nol/newsid_6950000/newsid_6958000?redirect=6958025.stm&news=1&nbwm=1&nbram=1&bbwm=1&bbram=1&asb=1
  >>   >>
  >>   >>   Anyway, there are only thoughts for the time being, but it is
  >>   >> interesting
  >>   >>   to further add that it wasn’t always the case that dinosaurs were
  >>   >> thought
  >>   >>   to have lived and “ruled the Earth” in their own right 65,000,000
  >>   >> years
  >>   >>   ago. Many museums of the 19th century put abundant evidence of  
  >> the
  >>   >>   co-existence of dinosaurs and man on display. If someone is  
  >> going to
  >>   >>   challenge me on this, they are most welcome.
  >>   >>
  >>   >>   Former dinosaur expert,
  >>   >>
  >>   >>   Steven.
  >>   >>
  >>   >>
  >>   >>
  >>   >>   --
  >>   >>   No virus found in this incoming message.
  >>   >>   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  >>   >>   Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.28/1021 - Release Date:
  >>   >> 21/09/2007 2:02 PM
  >>   >>
  >>   >
  >>   >
  >>   >
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>   --
  >>   Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>   --
  >>   No virus found in this incoming message.
  >>   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  >>   Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.28/1023 - Release Date:  
  >> 22/09/2007 1:27 PM
  >>
  >
  >
  >



  -- 
  Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/




  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1025 - Release Date: 23/09/2007 
1:53 PM

Other related posts: