[geocentrism] That's "X" Invectives and Zero Refutes
- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 10:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Benoit wrote:
What in the world is this ( your concept of conspiracy )? Do you think that
conspiracy is "just another topic" that the average morons can easily chat
about in public - for example at the downtown café while clutching a cup of
coffee during break? You cannot be serious. If you even hinted at being an
advocate of a ( woldwide ) conspiracy you'll be branded a kook before your
cappuccino cream fizzes. Anyone who had a chat knows that despite you being
very delicate and
non-confrontational about the conspiracy you are raising
[ the heliocentric deception ], you'll still get nothing but invective. You
know what that means? It means they have no arguments - that they can't even
begin refuting any of your points, so instead they feign "authority" and
pretend that it is "beneath them" to get down to your "level" and discuss the
nitty-gritty of the HARD FACTS. Lack of response covered-up by
smoke-and-mirrors of namecalling and invective.
And that's all that counts here: the facts, just the facts.
Insert by bb
---------------------------------
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] That's "X" Invectives and Zero Refutes
