[geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 19:34:46 +0000 (GMT)
Jack L
No Jack -- not a library -- just five points. No one alive is going to debate
someone else on any subject if that someone is going to list his points as
"Anything in this book -- and if you answer all of those, why, I'll just pick
another book". Surely you have just one thing which speaks to you of confidence
in your cause?
I'm not trying to goad goad you and I'm not looking to have a field day
ridiculing geocentrists.
I've said this before -- if you choose, you may claim that the Moon is made of
blue cheese and I for one will not argue with you. But if you claim that your
position is backed by science, I will seek to show you the error of your ways.
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 9 November, 2007 6:39:23 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
OK Paul,
Everything that is written in GWW pertaining to MS science and much of what is
on geocentric websites. So Paul if I were you, rather trying to goad me, why
not wait until whoever knocks the stuffing out of geocentrism, have a field day
of ridicule not only me but all the other geocentrists.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
Jack L
Perhaps so, but the request was not for results of original research, just five
points which you personally perceive to be compelling.
Paul D
National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week.
Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.
http://au.blogs.yahoo.com/national-bingo-night/
Other related posts: