[geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 09:34:35 +1000
Repeat for Jack and Allen;
Regner asked the question if you all remember, what happens to a spinning
bicycle wheel, if you try to turn it sideways..
In Newtonian physics thats the proof of the HC system.
Newtons laws are demonstrable and satisfactory for dealing with motion, if not
the reason why, at least the properties as experienced.
Hold the axel firmly with wheel edge in front of your nose whilst the wheel is
spinning rapidly. Now try to rotate your body.
A spinning flywheel is stable and resists angular rotation around its axis of
rotation . You can test this principle as Regner suggested. .
The bicycle depends on this principle to work.
A bicycle wheel that is suspended vertically and powered to rotate
continuously, with the axel pointing east- west. in a frame having no
resistance to rotation in any direction , (set in gymbol bearings) will
maintain it orientation vertically for ever, except , because the earth is
rotating one revolution per day, this frame will not turn with the motion of
the earth.
Consequently if you are looking at this wheel edge on from the North, you will
see the frame with the wheel turn slowly clockwise , making one complete turn
per day. If it was vertical on 12 oclock at noon, it will be pointing at 1 an
hour later, and so on.
If the world was not rotating with any angular movement, this flywheel would
remain in the vertical orientation .
We have known about, and discussed this here for years, why do we keep running
away from it? Long range ballistic missile computers using inertial guidance
systems must program in this rotation to stay on course..
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 7:37 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
uh yea ..im at a loss here to phil........how does that prove HC again..?
Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK Philip,
What's the relevance, please explain?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 9:10 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Regner concedes?
If Regner conceded and accepted that the geocentric proof of geocentrism
Jack asked Paul?
Jack, Regner never will concede such a thing..
He asked the question if you all remember, what happens to a spinning
bicycle wheel, if you try to turn it sideways..
In Newtonian physics thats the proof of the HC system.
I told you all this yesterday..
We need to fault Newtons laws and prove it, to win this debate.. I'm
hoping Robert with GWW can do that.
Philip..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - Release Date: 4/11/2007
11:05 AM
Other related posts:
