I might try again sometime but i have already tried to talk to him....unfortunately he strikes me as not only anti- establishment but anti-anything that does not conform to what "he already knows"..He appears to be locked into his own world with no time or hope of seeing anything beyond the universe he has constructed for himself....I could be wrong...but maybe you or someone else could give it a try...in any case...let me say that he sees his prime numbers equation for entirely different reasons and different implications to cosmology then the potential I point out..and for obvious reasons....... He is not sympathetic to the GC position at all, that i can tell.....He has his own ideas that are although somewhat interesting with even tidbits of potential sprinkled in, over all, are in my estimate about as useful as the HC dogma itself, just in a different direction....another "dead end" cosmology I fear.... His prime numbers solution equation is fairly strait forward mathematically and doe not rely on assumptions or favorite "pets". The significance I point out in the prime wave function is if at all only vaguely aludded to almost as if in passing remarks….although I think he sees the harmonic nature and potential he is stuck on, if any, the harmonics of electrodynamics for explanations of the universe, where in aether theory, it is the aether and the properties of it, as well as dynamics of aether that determine how EMR and Electrodynamics work…in fact electrodynamics is just one aspect of the everyday world of physics & its dynamics that are determined by the aether. His idea is the everyday physics world itself is determined by the electrodynamics ….it is like pulling a tire of a car and claiming the tire is what holds the car together and controls why and how it moves…. The tire is just a part of the car and is part of the function of control not the control itself… Unfortunately, he is totally convinced of that erroneous idea….. He appears to not take kindly to any interpritaions external of the ones he has laid out..... --- On Sun, 9/7/08, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Prime numbers To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sunday, September 7, 2008, 12:19 AM Allen, maybe you should write to him and tell him.. He believes our world is a planet...Which is reasonable enough, but as he is on the outside of astronomy and Nasa, maybe he just needs a little push.. from an already sympathetic customer... . Philip. ----- Original Message ----- From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 12:55 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Prime numbers The wave form described by Mccanney's prime numbers solution demonstrates and shows how fractal patterns are created in such things as snowflakes using the PRIMES wave form........... ....ummmmm.....i think we could posibly find our next big leap forward in understanding the mechanics of the universe in this area perhaps and maybe closer then we think...."just around the corner"..... --- On Sat, 9/6/08, allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Prime numbers To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 7:47 PM The New Scientist Article I refered to is in March 10-16 2007 Vol 193 No 2594 The article is called "Fractal Universe" http://www.newscientist.com/contents/issue/2594.html See also: http://www.fractaluniverse.org/ http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw/NOF.HTM http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn14200-galaxy-map-hints-at-fractal-universe.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_cosmology http://goldenmean.info/fractaluniverse/ http://www.fractal.org/Bewustzijns-Besturings-Model/The-Infinite-Fractal-Universe.pdf --- On Sat, 9/6/08, allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Prime numbers To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 7:52 AM Ok, the web contains basical no usfull info to reference only his treastise goes into usfull detail;...thefore: Under Title 17, Ch 1 section 107 of the Copyright Law of the United States of America commonly refered to as the the "fair use clause" http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107 I will send a PDF scan file to those who want to study it, However, I do not want to post that copywritted material on the public forum, thus i will send to directly to email address for thoes who want to studdy it for accidemic purposes.. there is a 3 hour lecture on DVD He gives if you buy his book...I recomend it I have both......his book & DVD are only $24.95 for both includes shipping to any US address......... http://www.calculateprimes.com/BookDVDOrderSubPage.HTM Copyright Law of the United States of America and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the United States Code Circular 92 Chapter 1 Subject Matter and Scope of Copyright § 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Prime numbers To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 5:53 AM Can you give me a reference for that, Allen, I must have missed it? Neville. -----Original Message----- From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Has anyone else out there (Mathematically in-depth) taken a look at Mccanney's prime number solutions equation...? I think it could have a relationship/ useful for analyzing gravitational wave forms........perhaps even causal for Fibonacci sequence and the golden mean..I’m trying to get a graph of that solution…….Even New Scientist ( last year I think) had a article about the Fractal nature of the distribution of mass in the universe….I wish we could get some more rigorous mathematical eyes on this.. It could be the key to understanding the nature of the mechanics of gravitational wave forms and the medium which prorogates it…… I think I’m gona try and see if I can Get Dr Hanson to take a look at it ……Ill call him first….I’ll let you know what he thinks….anyway if anyone else out there has looked at this ( I realize Mccanney is “out there”) but this particular work of his is fascinating stuff….!. Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click. Visit www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out!