[geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth Deception
- From: Robert Bennett <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:49:28 -0400
Jack L
Therefore why aren't Michaelson and Morely et al scientific heroes?
I'm on very shaky ground here, but my understanding is that the experiment
to which you are probably refering was interpreted by the two 'camps' to
have had different conclusions.
Had the non revolving Earth conclusion been correct, then the way the
universe works would have been very different from the way it is understood
to work.
[Robert Bennett]
The difference in understanding between GC and HC/AC would be very great.
However the difference in observations would be very slight - the difference
between aether and gravity has only been detectable for about a century.
But more GC proofs are unfolding each day.
In this position, I'd venture the guess that none of the space missions
outside the Earth/Moon system would have succeeded, instead of which a quite
large proportion have succeeded hansomly.
[Robert Bennett]
The old canard - that you must use HC to navigate in the Solar System - is
contrary to general covariance and exposed in GWW as a myth promoted by a
certain USA space agency.
Does ESA insist that they use HC navigation - because they must?
On shaky ground... yes
then why venture the guess?
RB
Paul D
Other related posts:
