[geocentrism] Moon Rotation

  • From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:04:34 -0800 (PST)

Allen D
 
You said -- 
Paul, The curt remarks I referred to are made by me. My post are at some times 
more disciplined then others but don’t let that bother you. I’m not playing 
dumb, not at all. I am just giving you and others ample opportunity to say 
"less then brilliant" things of which you and Phil have not disappointed me 
with…I then remark in very, perhaps extreme sarcastic manner. I’m sorry you 
can’t see beyond your own logical contradictions, …. but then again you never 
did get the whole gravity= inertia thingy either…..Note I did not start out 
that way but I keep coming to the same conclusion about most not all but 
certainly most of your arguments, they are focused on "claiming victory" not on 
evaluating the possibility that they are completely wrong. ….. As I said before 
this thread will just go in circles. It will most certainly not progress your 
learning at all because ..well we all know why…….but my point is not so much 
for me to convince you
 of your error. You truly believe in your own folly and will not be shown 
otherwise! It is to offer others a chance to understand and evaluate the real 
world and the kinds of people that live in it…….. 
'... claiming victory ...' Yes -- it could be so construed. I however see it as 
an attempt to contribute to your education in reality. By contrast, your 
position is characterised by avoiding admission of error at any cost. The most 
demeaning of mental gyrations is not beneath you in this endeavour.
 
'... that they are completely wrong ...' Well I've asked if you would explain 
what is meant by "Progressive radial orientation to a common point" with 
particular reference to its application to the rotation and revolution of 
Uranus and the identification of that common point in that instance. This is 
only my second request so it may be too early to add this question to the 
lengthening list of items which you refuse to address but I suspect it is none 
the less destined for that distinction.
 Paul D


      Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter now 
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/?p1=other&p2=au&p3=tagline

Other related posts: