# [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

• To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:22:06 +1000
```Allen the moons axis is several degrees off that of the earth!..does that make
two LOL..  Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 6:52 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Moon Rotation

Phil,
"But you can see the difficulty in English expression you present"
NO! I said it means more then one……. you stated no it does not mean
that……...Phil the fact there is more then one is inherent, intrinsic, integral
part of the meaning of synonymous!? You cannot separate that fact any more then
you can separate the fact that a living human has water in them!? if they are
alive ..then Phil that means water is present!?

Come to the table with some reason........ you are just attempting
"linguistic acrobatics" now... If you have a plate dill a hole in the center
and put it on a drill there is only one axis of rotation...you may consider
that axis to be a mathematical line (having no dimension) or you can also
consider that axis to have the same diameter of the plate itself...the net
effect is the same....one axis of rotation..not billions of axis for each
molecule in the plate.....one axis not many….Counting the same thing twice does
not mean you have two of them!?

--- On Wed, 12/3/08, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 12:22 PM

﻿
Philip,

"Allen opens up a rebuttal with, "Synchronous means more then
one...OK "

No Allen  it does not mean more than one..  HERE IS THE
GENERALLY ACCEPTED MEANING".....

Phil.....you can't have a simoltanious anything with just one
of them..!?

Allen, Oh!  now I get what you were trying to say, but please
don't say sorry for getting it wrong..  You said "synchronous"  means more than
one..     I said it doesn't mean that at all ... two or many is more than one..
I don't recall a single word for that meaning..  But you can see the
difficulty in English expression you present. Even this is out of this world
for sense..  "you can't have a simoltanious anything with just one of them..!?
"

Perhaps you may now understand my reasons, when I referred to
English as being essential for science...  Philip.

```