[geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

Allen the moons axis is several degrees off that of the earth!..does that make 
two LOL..  Phil
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 6:52 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Moon Rotation




        Phil,
        "But you can see the difficulty in English expression you present"
        NO! I said it means more then one……. you stated no it does not mean 
that……...Phil the fact there is more then one is inherent, intrinsic, integral 
part of the meaning of synonymous!? You cannot separate that fact any more then 
you can separate the fact that a living human has water in them!? if they are 
alive ..then Phil that means water is present!?

        Come to the table with some reason........ you are just attempting 
"linguistic acrobatics" now... If you have a plate dill a hole in the center 
and put it on a drill there is only one axis of rotation...you may consider 
that axis to be a mathematical line (having no dimension) or you can also 
consider that axis to have the same diameter of the plate itself...the net 
effect is the same....one axis of rotation..not billions of axis for each 
molecule in the plate.....one axis not many….Counting the same thing twice does 
not mean you have two of them!?



         



                --- On Wed, 12/3/08, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

                  From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
                  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                  Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 12:22 PM


                   
                  Philip,
                    
                  "Allen opens up a rebuttal with, "Synchronous means more then 
one...OK "

                   No Allen  it does not mean more than one..  HERE IS THE 
GENERALLY ACCEPTED MEANING"..... 


                  Phil.....you can't have a simoltanious anything with just one 
of them..!? 



                  Allen, Oh!  now I get what you were trying to say, but please 
don't say sorry for getting it wrong..  You said "synchronous"  means more than 
one..     I said it doesn't mean that at all ... two or many is more than one.. 
 I don't recall a single word for that meaning..  But you can see the 
difficulty in English expression you present. Even this is out of this world 
for sense..  "you can't have a simoltanious anything with just one of them..!? 
"  

                  Perhaps you may now understand my reasons, when I referred to 
English as being essential for science...  Philip.

Other related posts: