[geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 07:41:54 +1000

well yes it has two elements of angular momentum..  One due to the orbital 
motion, and one due to its angular rotation around its own axial centre..   As 
my first answer was..  

 



the answer is the same for diagram B..  The angular momentum of an object still 
has two elements...  one with respect to its own centre axis, and one with 
respect to the primary centre. 



However I have difficulty still with your terminology..  Poles generally refers 
to the opposite ends of the axis of rotation. In B you seem to have the poles 
shifted to the plane of the orbit, which now makes these the equator. and the 
rotation is still vertical to plane of the orbit, which make for new poles, to 
and bottom. and a new equator..  



I did tell you I have difficulty reading static diagrams of a dynamic system.  



Phil

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Deema 
  To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:44 PM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation


  Philip M
  re Moon Rotation -- From Paul Deema Thu Nov 27 01:37:59 2008 (Attachment 
ThreeObjects.png) addressed to Allen D.
  I recall your oft stated difficulty visualising physical motions, moving 
mechanisms et al, but regardless, I am interested in your take on the questions 
included in the illustration. Allen of course has a vested interest in simply 
pronouncing my offerings as "Your post is nonsense!" but I believe that you may 
well be able to see what I am getting at.
  Would you comment please?
  Paul D





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter Now

References:
- [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
  - From: Paul Deema

[geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

Other related posts: