[geocentrism] Re: MS illogic

Pre conceptions are a barrier and difficulty when one wishes to examine a new 
idea. Another is what is known as the characteristics of the human brain, under 
anatomy of the human brain..  And I doubt that there is any other difficulty as 
great as these when it comes to examining geocentrism.. At least for me to 
conceive it, and for you (meaning others) to present it. Together they 
interfere with communication, a type of Babel.

When Neville talks of epicycles, I am baffled. People have a variety of mental 
gifts and impediments. A person with autism can work out large calculations in 
a second. Others who have been shown to have a brain which is only 10% grey 
matter and 90% fluid, can hear a piano sonata once, and play it instantly 
without any musical training, or paint a photagraphic image from memory after 
only one viewing. 

I cannot create or visualise a mental image. Ideas yes, but they have to be 
drawn on paper for me to visualise them and verify them so to speak. Also a 
lifetime of HC indoctrination tends to create confusion in everybodies 
communications to varying degrees. 

Thus it is that I asked a question yesterday that seemed logical at the time, 
about utilising the earths orbital velocity to analyse for doppler , and 
subsequently also a means of determining GS by measuring signal lag between 
earth and a deep space probe.  

It was a stupid question because I had never before hand tried to visualise 
what was happening that created the difference in sidereal and solar time.  I 
think I got it now, but whether It affected the original question I cannot say. 
If I visualise it right, then here is what I see ..  Please let me know if it 
is wrong..  

Correct universal time of the cosmos is sidereal time. The stars as an imbedded 
 cosmologically whole, take 23 hours and 56 minutes to circle the earth. Let me 
assume this is the rate for the aether or firmament. Though this may need 
correction if we take galactic space into consideration. But Im staying close 
to home.  Now, just as the moon slips behind in this aether or firmament, so 
likewise the sun slips behind, and as a result we get a solar day of 24 hours. 

If I apply this and think hard, it means that we will get to see a complete 360 
degree night time view of the stars over one full year of time. And this gives 
us the illusion that HC uses to to justify a planetery earth circling the sun 
every 365+/- days. Deep breath!  Did the penny drop right? 

But I'm having trouble with another visual..  According to all of the above, 
given we have a static earth, the distance a deep space probe is from the earth 
should still not vary over a complete year, and the signal delay should alway 
be the same allowing only for its increasing progress away from earth, as I 
proposed yesterday. And HC has a problem.

Awaiting for correction, 

Philip. 



 
Sidereal time vs solar time. Above left, a distant star (the small red circle) 
and the Sun are at culmination, on the local meridian. Centre: only the distant 
star is at culmination (a mean sidereal day). Right: few minutes later the Sun 
is on the local meridian again. A solar day is complete

Other related posts: