-----Original Message-----
From: pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:50:45 +1000You are missing Nevilles point all together Jack//Neville said he is NOT out to convince anyone.. He is acting in the natural order of presuming a God to his own intellect and conscience.He implies everyone may do the same and be judged accordingly.Without any externally certain input direct from Heaven, I have to agree.. He wants a God of love.. If God is not a God of Love, then there is no point proceeding is there, except as a whimp. Love and whimpery do not go together.He rejects your God as interpreted freely by your conscience according to a Book, which you claim to be the sole source of revelation... the book and your conscience.. He likewise has no good reason, as he sees it , to accept any man made institution as being of Divine origins. without concrete evidence.. I did the same..Philip.----- Original Message -----From: Jack LewisSent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:28 AMSubject: [geocentrism] Re: Life after deathNeville,
Why do you jump to such totally unnecessary and silly conclusions? All asked you was how do you convince someone who is searching to adopt your idea of the truth? How do you pass-on to him what you have found out?
Imagine someone who doesn't have your IQ and the best he could do at school was to get a 'C' in a geography GCSE. How would you tell him the 'good news' you have found out about God? Can you not see what it is I'm trying find out? It is a very simple question.
Jack
Neville Jones wrote:
Neville,
How do you convince a seeker of the truth that he should listen to you? Why would I need to do that? I do not advocate "churches" and "priests." I am no one's "priest" and I am certainly not going to move to America and make my fortune establishing a "church."
What are you saying that will convince him that you have discovered the key? God is goodness and truth.
Jack / Neville