[geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:31:19 +0100
Dear Paul,
I'm no financial geek but I ask you to consider this.
Everyone knows that NASA spends billions on space research. Where exactly does
the money go? It certainly isn't wasted as many people believe. The money
simply changes hands and moves around - its all still here trapped on earth.
The only thing that gets wasted is the energy used and the bits of hardware
that get left in space or burnt-up on re-entry. Since the way that money is
printed and equated to 'goods' is controlled by the people with the power,
governments, bankers etc. they can do exactly what they like. This is what is
happening in Zimbabwe and is caused by the very people I have just mentioned. I
can't remember who made this quote but it went something like this, "I care not
about the laws of a country, just give me control of its finances and I will
control everybody."
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 4:08 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
Quite simple really, just a matter of power and money - and I have unlimited
supplies of both do I not. Well there is a flaw in this argument. So many
people think that money is just printed paper. It isn't. If you print more
money than there is production of goods to back it, it devalues proportionally,
thus while there may be more bits of paper in circulation, you can only buy
what has been produced and that for inflated prices. Robert Mugabe and Zimbabwe
are an excellent example. Just 15 minutes ago, I saw the BBC carry the news
item that Zimbabwe's bread producers warned that they had only two days supply
of flour available.
- References:
- [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- From: Paul Deema
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- » [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- [geocentrism] Re: Leonardo and Richard
- From: Paul Deema