Dear Philip, It's the curvature relative to the feature sizes in the Japanese photo and then compared with the larger curvature and lesser detail in the NASA photo. Regarding the high definition of the Jap photo, the NASA photo was supposed to have been taken on film - a very much higher resolution because of the emulsion grain size. The two moons shown cannot possibly be the same moon with or without stars. Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: philip madsen To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:32 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Japan Probe Sends Photos and Video Yes understood I'm more concerned at no stars... This does not mean faked, but maybe manufactured.Its called digital enhancement. Philip. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Lewis To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 11:18 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Japan Probe Sends Photos and Video Dear Philip, My statement was based on the only other photos I've seen of the moon which were supposedly taken by astronauts. These showed a much less curved horizon when compared to the detail and size of the craters. Take another look at the Japanese pics. Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: philip madsen To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:15 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Japan Probe Sends Photos and Video Thats a matter of distance from the camera... again????? However the moon is only 3, 746 km across, a mere football.. Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1119 - Release Date: 8/11/2007 5:55 PM