[geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts (Supplementary)
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:10:30 -0800 (PST)
Steven,
I think it is imporataint to point out that a camera always points to the
nightl sky........ to "have your back to the axis of roation" is a meaningless
concept to a camera (camera film)........It is the rotaion of the camera/ film
from what ever angle is the intial camera angle it is set to. As long as the
camera roatates around the axis the roation, it will be recorded and is not
restricted to a ceratin time..ie expsoures or 3-4 hours per night (midnight at
the center point of the exposure) over the course of the year will cause the
camera and flim to rotate throught all 360 degrees of roation around the solar
axis.....period! a camera has no back if looking up at the night sky. If that
roation cannot be captured on film then there is absolutly no way the nightly
rotaion could be captured. The only differnce between the two rotaions is the
path of rotaion and the larger/longer time needed/involved for capturing the
second rotation in the other directions on film......
Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Phillip Stott wrote:
> Why Steven?
>
> We need the axis of rotation at our back, and that is near enough the
> sun from an HS perspective.
Your correct. :-) I agree, actually, it is 24 hours that is essential
for this.
Best wishes,
Steven.
>
> All the best
>
> Philip Stott
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Jones"
>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 3:58 PM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts
> (Supplementary)
>
>
>> Phillip Stott wrote:
>>> Consider this from HS perspective
>>> Nightly rotation. Observer looks out with his back to axis of
>>> rotation. Take snapshots every few minutes. Star trails observed.
>>> Annual rotation. Observer must again have his back to tha axis of
>>> rotation, but the rotation of earth complicates the motion, now only
>>> at midnight does the observer have his back to the axis of rotation.
>>> So take a snapshot each midnight. Star trails observed.
>> No, it should be a snapshot every 23h 56m.
>>
>> Steven.
>>> GS view exactly as HS but relative motion explanation.
>>> Philip Stott
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> *From:* j a
>>> *To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2007 4:24 PM
>>> *Subject:* [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts
>>> (Supplementary)
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>> As I said in another post, I cannot see how pointing the camera in
>>> any particular direction would affect what is recorded. What I
>>> have since been working on is the fact that the camera is not
>>> moving with the axis of rotation for the annual trail but is for
>>> the nightly trail. I am trying to get a grip on how this effects
>>> what we should expect to see.
>>> JA
>>>
>>>
>>> */Paul Deema
/* wrote:
>>>
>>> J A -- was my explanation of the incorrectness of your very
>>> elaborate illustration lacking in some manner in your
>>> estimation? I think this is important.
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.16/1102 - Release Date:
>>> 10/31/2007 4:38 PM
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database:
>> 269.15.22/1111 - Release Date: 11/5/2007 4:36 AM
>>
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
