Phillip Stott wrote:
Consider this from HS perspective
Nightly rotation. Observer looks out with his back to axis of
rotation. Take snapshots every few minutes. Star trails observed.
Annual rotation. Observer must again have his back to tha axis of
rotation, but the rotation of earth complicates the motion, now only
at midnight does the observer have his back to the axis of rotation.
So take a snapshot each midnight. Star trails observed.
No, it should be a snapshot every 23h 56m.
Steven.
GS view exactly as HS but relative motion explanation.
Philip Stott
----- Original Message -----
*From:* j a <mailto:ja_777_aj@xxxxxxxxx>
*To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2007 4:24 PM
*Subject:* [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts
(Supplementary)
Paul,
As I said in another post, I cannot see how pointing the camera in
any particular direction would affect what is recorded. What I
have since been working on is the fact that the camera is not
moving with the axis of rotation for the annual trail but is for
the nightly trail. I am trying to get a grip on how this effects
what we should expect to see.
JA
*/Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
J A -- was my explanation of the incorrectness of your very
elaborate illustration lacking in some manner in your
estimation? I think this is important.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.16/1102 - Release Date:
10/31/2007 4:38 PM
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database:
269.15.22/1111 - Release Date: 11/5/2007 4:36 AM
