Regner T Reading your response and reflecting on the matter, I see that my anxiety was inappropriate. I'll attempt to keep a tighter rein on things in the future. I guess we're all keen to embark upon the debate. If only we had that complete list of five reasons why ... Your information concerning Stromolo is gratifying. These are the kind of details which do not make the evening news. Certainly they will always lose out to a vista of towering flames and smoke. Paul D ----- Original Message ---- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, 22 October, 2007 3:01:17 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts? Thank you, for your E-mail and thanks for making it short, to the point, and to provide a link to the earlier correspondence you refer to. I did indeed see that post, and I am sorry for not having had time to respond. If you read my start of this thread //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/10-2007/msg00209.html , however, you will see that what I seek is not propositions for experiments to verify one or the other theory, but a short list of the most pertinent evidence in support of your theory. Your post will be relevant much later in this discussion. All the telescopes of Mt Stromlo, the library and the instrumentation workshop, burned down in that bush-fire. But people were back at work (first on the ANU campus - a few weeks later on the mountain) a few days later. All our computers and data survived. The workshop and the admin/library has been rebuilt and we are building a new telescope, Skymapper, at Siding Springs. Regards, Regner Trampedach Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html