[geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:07:41 -0800

Dear Jack,

"Coincidence fudge factor"? Sounds like an Aussie sun tan lotion. I do not know what you mean.

Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com


-----Original Message-----
From: jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:56:08 -0000

Dear Neville,
The drawing was just a thought in that it may help explain. The following was taken from your paper on this subject from your website.

'But this is not what we see. Rotation about the ecliptic polar axis is demonstrable for the Sun and, to a close approximation, most of the planets, but not for the stars. Yearly circular motion of the stars, irrespective of whether one assumes it to be real or apparent, about the ecliptic poles is not observed.'

What I was trying visualise was what kind of trail would the heliocentric model stars make over a period of one year? I know they don't because of the 'coincidence' fudge factor, but if there were no fudge factor what would we expect to see in the heliocentric model? If you can explain it to me then I would be happy to try and illustrate it.

 

Jack


Get Free 5GB Online Storage - Safely store your documents, photos and music online!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/storage to find out more!

Other related posts: