[geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:58:14 +1100
Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Dear Paul
> Me in Red Paul
>
> Jack L
>
> Paul Deema wrote:
> >
> > Just a few comments in this <colour><> Only a few because I generally
> > have respect for most of what you say.
> >
> > Paul D
> >
> >
> > <Actually no. I don't accept an aether because there is no objective
> > evidence for its existence -- at least of which I am aware -- and it
> > is of course pivotal to your case. Without it, your model crumbles.>
> > Yes its a bit like abiogenesis, without it there is nothing to
> > kick-start evolution and therefore without it the model crumbles.
>
Not at all, Jack.
Evolution does NOT rest on abiogenesis - there could just as well be
a divine creation of life, some 3.4 billion years ago, that then evolved.
As I have said before, evolution says nothing about HOW life STARTED.
Just as the Big Bang model doesn't say why and how it all started. It does
however provide us with a pretty good idea of what happened afterwards
- as confirmed by observations.
- Regner
- Follow-Ups:
- [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Jack Lewis
- References:
- [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Paul Deema
- [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Jack Lewis
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Jack Lewis
- [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Paul Deema
- [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Jack Lewis