[geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:16:24 +1100
Jack,
Of course there are problems - there are things we don't know yet.
Will you please allow science that. And remember; science is a method
for inquiry - it is not a set of facts.
Anyway, none of that has anything to do with the claim of yours
that I replied to, which was (paraphrased): "that without knowing HOW
life or the Universe started, the scientific theories of evolution and
big bang fall apart." That claim is wrong, and others have pointed
that out too. I think it was Paul who used the analogy of a house and
the blue-print for the house - the house will still stand, if the blue-
print was destroyed.
Regner
Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Sorry Regner but your Big Bang and evolution are both beset with serious
> problems. See the attachments to my reply to Paul's e-mail.
>
> Jack L
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Regner Trampedach" <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:58 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Integrity in science
>
>
> > Not at all, Jack.
> > Evolution does NOT rest on abiogenesis - there could just as well be
> > a divine creation of life, some 3.4 billion years ago, that then evolved.
> > As I have said before, evolution says nothing about HOW life STARTED.
> > Just as the Big Bang model doesn't say why and how it all started. It does
> > however provide us with a pretty good idea of what happened afterwards
> > - as confirmed by observations.
> >
> > - Regner
> >
>
Other related posts:
