[this email came back to me undeliverable the first time sent. gls] > Jack, I have done pretty much what you said. I put a couple of provacative > posts up about the atmosphere "proving geocentrism" and another for > "relative motion" being flawed and I got thoroughly jumped up on. So after > my first full day on Rob's turf today I am battered and bruised but > encouraged. I am just pounding the same message back at everyone who > attacks me. But it is only two different things. > > By the way, no one yet agrees. About 40 attacks, thus far. I am tired of > fending them all off. It's fun for now though. And I'm learning new > tactics at the same time, so it's worth it. But it is awfully late now so I > am going to quit. Let the wolves have a shot at me again tomorrow. Or > maybe the better metaphor would be the bulls attacking the matador (me). > Ha. > > In geostasis, > > Gary Shelton > > P.S.: I don't use the "In geostasis" signoff over there, but I do have a > signature tag which quotes Psalms 19:6. I have to be difficult, you know. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:25 AM > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: I made a mistake, I think > > > > If you take my advice try and stay with just 1 (ONE) item at a time and > don't > > let anyone try and draw you away from requiring an answer. If they get > tired > > of you 'hammering' the same question all the time, make the decision to > > leave it alone because it will be totally fruitless. > > > Jack > > > > > >