[geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:04:01 -0000
Dear Regner,
As I see it the problem at this moment in time is the ability/inability to
show/not show rotation/spin of the earth round the sun. Is this going to be a
problem for Regner to explain without viewing the Earth/sun movement from
outside the solar system? The geo's seem to be able to explain it within. If
they are not, then what are they missing?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:37 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead
Defend it?...there is nothing to deffend...Regner's mind is not allowing him
to see the obvious 1.Paul's own diagram that he praised disproves HC
2. According to Regner ther is no rotation around the sun and yet the
conditon HC descibes for the earth is the defintion he gives for Rotation..?
SNIP
Regner Trampedach wrote:
Don't worry, Jack - there wasn't any.
Other related posts:
