[geocentrism] Re: Grew
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
One more thing, those 200' titanic tidal waves the scoffers often refer to if
there was a global flood would be mitigated and dependent upon the expansion
rate of the earth?s surface area during the flood year ......those 200' tidal
waves would be no more then 10-20' swells......
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: In Newtonian/Einsteinian
gravity the strength or pull of gravity is based solely on the mass of the
object where I would argue for VG theory ... In VG theory gravity is a function
of the mass as well as shape/ volume of the object(s) in question like the sand
on the sound boards shape/volume is just as important as mass/density.... if
the earth were 1/3 the size it is now the gravitational effects would not be
that much different since the relative distance to the center of mass would be
nearly the same when accounting for the increase in density that a earth 1/3
the size would have. Although water does not compress generally, the density of
tap water is less than the density of sea water, the density of the earths
crustal core with a hydration of say .007% would be far more dense then the
water itself. In this way if the earth stretched due to a sudden catastrophic
release of say ~1/7 of that water (popcorn effect) the
density would decrease while the volume would increase this would account for
the apparent increase in gravity
(http://www.nealadams.com/EarthProject/antipangea.html) although the total mass
of the earth would have stayed the same. Floating on the flood waters the
effects for Noah would be nothing more then a ride on a conventional elevator.
It has been calculated that the heat distribution of rain water itself is not
sufficient for the task as well as the fact that scripture go to a lot of
emphasis about the fountains of the great deep. If the catastrophic release
were a nonlinear curve of water release ( Genisis 7:11 in that day all the
fountains of the great deep broken up) then it is quite reasonable to suspect
that the earth was flooded primarily due to the volume of water release greater
than the expansion rate until such time as the water release came began to stop
then the expansion overtook the water volume and the flood waters subsided into
the now ocean basins.
The weight of the water over the cracks at some point would keep the water
from spewing out into space and given the gravitational effects for the earth
at 1/3 size the necessary force for escaping the gravitational pull would be
greater since the differences in gravity would not be a strict linear curve in
a VG enviroment..... I cannot ignore the fact that the contents only fit
together on a smaller globe and the geology is one of stretching not subduction
unless you assume it first and ignore everything else,......in fact there is no
engine for subduction except the overall "gravitational? effects of HC
cosmology.. Umm.... Where a popcorned
(Relatively slowly primarily say over 1 year) earth would explain how and why
so many fossils are found on land and were not simply all wiped away in to the
ocean basins themselves particularly since if the flood took place on the earth
at its current size ..well do the math the present surface of the earth is 80%
water the erosion of all of the land masses would have dissolved almost
entirely into the oceans themselves unless the land mass was much greater in
the past but that poses a whole new set of problems in any explanation as well
as the fact that the continents do mach up together, one simple must ignore the
patterns....... other such evidence such a palladium halos, the fossile record
(size of animals and insects note there were giants in those days Genisis
6:4...ummm ...decrease in gravity would have that affect on a normal 6-7 foot
tall man today & dinos too, maybe even affect longevity ?) testify to the
quickness & totality of the event as well as the
narratives of the food story which demand a sudden catastrophic event rather
then any mild gradualistic event which also must take into account the
recessional effects of the water which would be quite different if the water
flowed in to a basin that opened at a rate almost consistent with the volume of
water created rather then a volume of water over the whole earth that recesses
into a gaping basin the erosion factors/ effects are entirely different. That
would be the effect if the size of the earth were the same and the water that
covered the whole earth is now all contained in the oceans..unless of course
you are to argue that some of the water that was then does not now exist here
on earth......Quite simply there is no other mechanical explanation that can
account for all the necessary variables that this model can intrinsically and
with what is observed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjgidAICoQI
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: The earths crust is .05% or
.005% (I cant remember which) water right now. A realese of only 2/5ths of what
is curently contained in the rocks would accout for all of todays oceans ......
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjgidAICoQI
You have to see this the more i think about it the more sense it makes from a
biblical stand point the whole quickness of the water level rise and fall in
the flood thing as well as gravity oxegen density dinos and ???..I dont belive
what I see this.."yoohoo"... actualy figured it out minus a few details like
the age of the earth.......look at the strech marks..I cant belive what
thoughts I have had over the last several hours.....!
http://www.nealadams.com/challenge.html
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I ran across this by accident, I have never heard of this , I?m certainly
not endorsing this, but in terms of perportions, ratios and such there are
some interesting underlying ideas. Granted they may led nowhere but his basic
idea bings to mind the biblical flood/water issues..I have seen Walter Brown?s
model and others which have many strengths but still problems, however the
basic idea here as far fetched and crazy as it may seem strikes me very
curiously....at first I thought this was a joke and did not think much about
it.....this guy is a entertainer not a professional scientist but after reading
much of the supporting pages and arguments and issues, it occurred to me that
by hook or by crook these wacked out ideas/theories may be worth the effort &
time to tear apart............
http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html
http://www.nealadams.com/EarthProject/newest.html
http://www.nealadams.com/EarthProject/fromthedesky.html
http://www.nealadams.com/EarthProject/antipangea.html
http://www.nealadams.com/PhysicsOfGrow.html
Other related posts:
