[geocentrism] Re: Global warming
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:40:20 +1000
This is startling .. and from 2004
http://www.bariumblues.com/methodic_demise_of_natural_earth.htm
THE METHODIC DEMISE OF NATURAL EARTH
~An Environmental Impact Overview~
By Dr. R. Michael Castle
In this century, we believe we are witnessing the gradual, purposeful demise of
the Earth's Natural System. There are those who will debunk/dis-info all that
is written regarding the subject of this paper: ChemTrails. What's this?
ChemTrails are only a vague description, in lay-terms, of a greater theater of
toxic materials being released into the atmosphere/stratosphere, for a myriad
of crude and toxic agendas.
The author, Dr. R. Michael Castle, will attempt to put this Global debacle into
a profile of events. Technical specificity of all the identified components
would require at least a book in length, to recite them all. A short
Bibliography follows, and links to various pertinent documents of
unquestionable validity.
First Rule of Understanding: There are very large, winner-take-all games
orchestrated by the Global Interests of the World. We have investigated,
researched and found substantial evidence of a multiplicity of Global
operations designed to mitigate various and theoretical Global catastrophes, as
defined by a late 1980's and 1990's International Panel of Conferees. (The
value of who are they, what's the politics smell like and all that is not of
the utmost importance in our attempt, herein, to describe what serious
destruction they have caused and are causing to Humans and our Finite
Environment. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: http://www.ipcc.ch)1
Global warming
Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release 23rd of July 2007
Email: cec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au
ABC hatchet job fails to suppress global warming truth
"Four hundred years ago, Johannes Kepler, the man who discovered universal
gravity, actually refuted the method of the IPCC report, of statistical
analysis, as being like Plato's Cave, of seeing the shadows on the wall . as
being reality. But these guys are just looking at the statistics of what they
are empirically seeing, that's 'true' for them. Now Johannes Kepler actually
proved that the previous models before him were incorrect, method-wise. Method
is very important-that's the crux of it."
When LaRouche Youth Movement member Lucas Duncan intervened in the studio
audience discussion following the ABC broadcast of the Great Global Warming
Swindle, he went to the heart of the scientific debate. Minutes earlier, marine
geologist Bob Carter's assertion that 1998 was the "hottest year on record",
and the earth had since cooled, was howled down by IPCC mouthpiece Prof. David
Karoly, who insisted that a statistical analysis using averages showed the
earth had warmed. The average of the three years 2006, 2005 and 2004 was warmer
than the average of the three years 1997, 1998 and 1999, and a linear
projection between those averages showed global warming, he said (see graph 1).
Carter's use of physical measurements shows the earth has cooled since 1998;
Karoly's statistical averages shows warming. The difference, is method. Kepler
proved statistical averages are flawed, and a fraud. The standard solar systems
models prior to Kepler-those of Ptolemy, Copernicus and Tycho Brahe-all had
planets orbiting in perfect circles, despite the observed contradiction that
the planets sped up, and slowed down (perfect circles would have caused uniform
motion). The contradiction was dismissed, by each model using an average of the
planets time and speed (called mean time). Kepler rejected the use of average
time, and insisted on taking the actual observed measurements, and in doing so,
made the most profound discoveries in astronomy: that the planetary orbits were
elliptical, and swept out equal areas in equal times. The rest is scientific
history.
Graph 1
Data from source: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu:80/public/msu/t2lt/tltglhmam_5.2
Chart adapted from John Christy & Roy Spencer, source:
http://www.marshall.org/pdf/materials/415.pdf
The ABC's host Tony Jones called this a "slightly obscure point to be making"
and didn't give the "scientists" on the panel the opportunity to answer. But by
that time, it was just another example of the sheer bias in the ABC's handling
of the broadcast.
The ABC crafted the "expert" panel to create a predictable effect. Out of the
eight panelists, Bob Carter was the only scientist supporting Durkin's general
hypothesis. Professor Carter recently reported at a Lavoisier Group meeting,
that the ABC invited and disinvited him several times and at that time he still
didn't know whether he'd be on the panel. He had never experienced this type of
behaviour in his entire academic career.
Tony Jones ridiculed Martin Durkin's failure to identify Fred Singer's period
as head of the US National Satellite Weather Service as the early 1960s, but
the ABC had told William Kininmonth, the head of the Australian Bureau of
Meteorology's National Climate Centre (for twelve years until 1998) and a
former Australian delegate to the World Meteorological Organization Commission
for Climatology, that he was not required on the expert panel, despite the fact
that he said he would be available. Why would the ABC prefer to feature Mont
Pelerinite Ray Evans and former punk rock band member, Michael Duffy over
Kininmonth? The ABC also knowingly picked Robyn Williams for his howling
protests against Durkin's film going to air. However, Williams was quite happy
having genocidalist, Dr John Reid on his Ockham's Razor program last year. Dr
Reid said a "humane way to reduce the population might be to put something in
the water, a virus that would be specific to the human reproductive system and
would make a substantial proportion of the population infertile." Dr Reid made
numerous hideous statements on population control without a whimper of protest
from Williams. At the end Williams merely said, "Some startling suggestions
there from John Reid..."
Most of the so-called errors that Martin Durkin made, were not errors at all
and any honest scientist will tell you, in most part the criticism of Durkin's
charts was baseless and even fraudulent. The 1990 IPCC report showed
temperatures were clearly higher during the Medieval period. This was too
inconvenient for the global warmers, so since 2001 the IPCC has attempted to
rewrite history, by using what is known as the hockey stick graph. (see graph
2) The hockey stick is a proven fraud and the computer program used to generate
it, produced hockey sticks from just about any set of data! This is the
"up-to-date graph" Durkin didn't use.
If the ABC had integrity, it would now subject Al Gore's movie to similar
scrutiny, and a similar debate. That probably won't happen, but the widespread
recognition of the bias in the broadcast means that many Australians know that
what they were exposed to contains truths, despite the efforts to discredit it.
Graph 2
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2006/11/05/nwarm05.gif
For Martin Durkin's response to the ABC's treatment of his documentary, see
Saturday's Australian (22/7/07):
http://theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,22105154-7582,00.html
See www.cecaust.com.au for more information,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.19/918 - Release Date: 25/07/2007
2:55 PM
Other related posts:
