[geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:05:35 +1000
More "exciting" stuff from Aspden.. http://waterfuel.t35.com/zpe_aspden.html
With all of his qualifications, if real, I can only assume he went "over the
edge " somewhere. Not surprising I suppose with a lot of the stuff he had
studied. Look at this,
"There is also a secret they have yet to fathom. It is the effect of creating a
radial electric field centred on electrical charge around which that quantum
underworld can develop a state of spin that causes it to shed energy. In the
presence of a radial electric field set up by an electrically charge body,
whatever constitutes that quantum underworld that permeates all space shares a
motion like that of sequence dancers who keep in step with one another as they
move around the dance floor, a synchronous motion, which, in the presence of
that radial electric field can only be held if a secondary motion develops
around an axis centred in that radial field." and
"
How else could the Sun spinning about its own axis have come into existence?
Here we have gravity attracting hydrogen atoms and pulling them so closely
together that ionization occurs, meaning freeing some electrons from their
proton bonding, and so, because the mass of a proton is very much greater than
that of the electron, creating a Sun having a body that is positively charged
sitting within an outer shell of negative electron charge. Two free protons
experience a mutual rate of gravitational acceleration that is 1836 times that
experienced by the interaction of two electrons. The body of the Sun,
therefore, has a uniform mass density and a uniform positive charge density
enclosed within a compensating negative charge at its surface. This is because
gravitational compaction forces balance the expansion forces attributable to
electrostatic repulsion. It further means the presence of a radial electric
field within the body of the Sun and, in turn, owing to the effect of this
field on the space medium of the quantum underworld, this induces a state of
spin accompanied by release of energy from that medium to feed the kinetic
energy of that spin.
In depth analysis of the physics involved, meaning the effect of the resulting
radial electric field on that quantum underworld, then allows one to calculate
the resulting rate of spin and thereby understand how the solar system was
created.
He went off limits the moment he mentioned quantum underworld. But then I am
not a Quantum enthusiast, So I had to go to his Message 2 directed towards me,
those with basic Electrical engineering.
Well It was not worth the time to put it here. He talks of Thunderballs from
lightning being energy from the quantum underworld. If they exist, then of
course their energy spins off the electrical charge inherent in the friction of
the clouds which produced the strike.
But you have the URL above.. I will stick with him till the end of the page..
Can always hope he has something, even if he does not understand it.
Philip
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 4:25 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_4_8_1.html
Dear Allen
I have for maybe a decade now investigated the The Adams & Aspden Motor
Patent .. They go on and on with theoretical papers, but never a working model.
I even looked at buying the plans from Adams plus his own magnets, but declined
after corrspondence from others already skinned who had no luck with the
claimed overunity free energy machine. This is why, though the sound of the
name was ringing bells, your spelling mistake distracted me and I could not
recover the information.
Laterly there was the dispute which I followed for years, between adams and
Lutec, who got great publicity here in my own state of Queensland, but who
never come good with any demonstrable machine that was over unity free energy.
An ongoing fiasco. http://www.lutec.com.au/ Lutec always failed to answer
emails with anything that sounded like scientific sense.. More like kids with a
toy, that did not work.
At the risk of sounding conceited, I have concluded after looking at their
theoretical explanations, with the thorough understanding of basic electricity
and magnetism that I consider I have, that they just do not have such
understanding. Just a dream.. we all have those. And it doesn't work. Adams
especially showed no knowledge of basic electricity, being self taught with
lots of self coined terminology....common among nearly all of the Free energy
exponents.. Look if they had a machine that work, they could let us have a
small cheap model to demonstrate for $20.. Instead of seeking millions to make
megastructures...
So Allen, Mr. Aspden cuts no ice with me if you want to quote him as a
scientist.
However we may if you think fit, check out those experiments which he
mentions for veracity, namely,
1. The aether certainly was detected in the laboratory when Michelson
found he could detect the Earth's rotation relative to that non-rotating aether
by his light wave interference experiments jointly with Gale in 1925.
2. The aether was detected some years earlier by Sagnac in France and is
detected in modern navigation technology by the ring laser gyro. How can the
speed of a laser beam traveling around a closed path inside an optical
instrument detect rotation of that instrument if the beam is not keeping a
fixed speed relative to something inside that instrument that does not share
its rotation? That something is the aether!
They of course assume a rotating earth to prove movement through an aether..
Of course the same result could indicate a rotating aether and a stationary
earth.
However I dispute the findings entirely for the moment till I check the
detail of the experiments.
Philip.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.12/878 - Release Date: 28/06/2007
5:57 PM
- References:
- [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- From: Allen Daves
- [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- From: philip madsen
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- » [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- From: Allen Daves
- [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- From: philip madsen