[geocentrism] Re: [Geocentric] Fw: inertia

From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:35:53 +1000
"energy of buoyancy" got me 4,230 pages. 

I always look sideways at science texts..  Is that lateral thinking..  We have 
been talking about energy, and the different types..eg heat.  Yet what is heat, 
but a symptom subjectively felt as temperature due to EMR which is created by 
vibration. ?  We should call it radiation energy, or rather temperature energy, 
but when conditions give it the potential to do work it is potential energy. 

Keeping it simple, energy is a condition that has potential to do work. If this 
condition cannot cause change, then it is not energy. Kinetic energy is nothing 
but potential energy because motion is relative and indeterminate. 

Yet again, looking at an atom of anything, can it of itself do work, i.e. 
effect change. Before nuclear "energy" we would not have thought so. Yet those 
who saw God as the Prime source of everything knew it. Everything IS potential 
energy.. I use wikipaedia, but it is suspect of error often. 
wikipedia: In general, the concept of energy refers to "the potential for 
causing changes." The word is used in several different contexts. The 
scientific use has a precise, well-defined meaning, whilst the many 
non-scientific uses often do not.

In physics, energy is mathematically defined as a work done by a certain force 
(gravitational, electric, magnetic, force of inertia, etc) and usually taken 
with a negative sign. Due to variety of forces, energy has many different forms 
(usually named after specific force involved), however these can be broken down 
into two main forms: kinetic energy and potential energy. According to the 
above definition, energy has the same units as work; a force applied through a 
distance. The SI unit of energy, the joule, equals one newton applied through 
one meter, for example......../

Joule = watt  is also the unit of  "power" When is energy converted?  Is it 
converted?  When I place a bottle of beer in the freezer, don't I extract the 
heat energy, and warm up the room? Yet the bottle bursts with enormous force 
... end quote. 

 In the rain cycle, all of the heat, latent and otherwise originating from the 
sun, is extracted from the water vapor waming the upper atmosphere, leaving the 
condensed water/ice to fall, gaining considerable kinetic energy..eventually 
converted into electrical power.   

I have so often accused science (at least popular science, those who talk 
global warming for example) of getting it wrong. Especially the students text 
books. Is it for simplification, or that they just don't know?

In the rain cycle just exampled, the standard feed for students, I left 
something out. They often leave it out. How did the moisture get lifted up to 
where the heat extraction makes the rain?

I don't think they know. I asked the question before? What is the energy source 
of convection currents in a fluid?

Look how wikipaedia sidesteps it:  

In the case of Earth's atmosphere, solar radiation heats the Earth's surface, 
and this heat is then transferred to the atmosphere by processes that are 
mostly convective. When a parcel of air is heated, it expands, becoming less 
dense and is pushed upward by buoyancy, carrying the heat energy upward with 
it. The air then cools, so it contracts, and sinks. The cycle then repeats with 
the cold air reheating and rising again. 

"is pushed upward by buoyancy"  is not a source of energy, less we look up 
buoyancy. No answer there but, this,

The buoyant force can be expressed using the following equation:

   
where

   is the density of the fluid; 
  V is the volume of the object submerged; 
  g is the standard gravity ( 9.81 N/kg on Earth). Negative sign must be used 
since the buoyancy is opposite in direction with the acceleration due to 
gravity. 
Which seems to tell us that it is negative gravity... And that is where we are 
at as regards Aether and gravity.  The action of gravity did work ..  None 
knows the exact how , do they.  

Philip
[geocentrism] Re: [Geocentric] Fw: inertia

Other related posts:
