[geocentrism] Re: For Phillip Concave Chatter
- From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:00:16 -0800
Stavs,
I thought you might throw this one in, just when everyone's minds are rotating and translating!
Dad
-----Original Message-----
From: steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:58:54 +0000
philip madsen wrote:
Neville said,
"The speed of light limitation is far more of a problem in a
huge universe than in a 'small' universe, but is still there, I grant
you."
First let me say I like this diversion. I was
not enjoying at all all the "cameras in orbits." on things that nobody
knows is moving. So we can keep the subject line ..
It's not a problem in the concave Earth model! :-) Simply because the
starry globe is so much smaller than the Earth and everything is
seemingly in the inverse so stars actually travel slower. Thus when you
see the stars move slowly, it's because they really are doing so! This
is totally the opposite of the heliocentric 1,000 mph spinning Globe
and the geocentric notion of anything past the secular distance of
Saturn doing a greater speed than light! I do have problems with these
fast speeds, not because I'm a relativity guy, I just don't see the
purpose of God putting stars so fast and far away just so that we can
have a display where no or very little (depending upon the
individual and whether in a happy hour or not) motion is perceived
with the eye.
Thought I would put that in for what it's worth.
Steven
As far as I can imagine, if it is impossible
for the sun to encircle the earth daily at
3.14159x 2 AU per day, Then anything up to infinity likewise.
(I'm assuming I worked it out that this orbit was faster than
186000mps, ) some way back, but the principle stands even if I am
wrong. I could have asked for Sirius.
I see a gramaphone record spinning. Its fluid
allows local systems movement. There is nothing else outside that
fluid. It could be TIME. PART OF A FOUR DIMENSIONAL OBJECT.
God is smart and powerful enough to do that
is He not? And sections of science are already well and truly
discussing this. We are just simple 3D folk.
Philip
- References:
- [geocentrism] Re: For Phillip
- From: philip madsen
- [geocentrism] Re: JA's 3D diagram
- From: Allen Daves
- [geocentrism] Re: For Phillip Concave Chatter
- From: Steven Jones
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Re: For Phillip Concave Chatter
- » [geocentrism] Re: For Phillip Concave Chatter
I thought you might throw this one in, just when everyone's minds are rotating and translating!
Dad
-----Original Message-----
From: steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:58:54 +0000
From: steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:58:54 +0000
philip madsen wrote:
Thought I would put that in for what it's worth.
Steven
It's not a problem in the concave Earth model! :-) Simply because the starry globe is so much smaller than the Earth and everything is seemingly in the inverse so stars actually travel slower. Thus when you see the stars move slowly, it's because they really are doing so! This is totally the opposite of the heliocentric 1,000 mph spinning Globe and the geocentric notion of anything past the secular distance of Saturn doing a greater speed than light! I do have problems with these fast speeds, not because I'm a relativity guy, I just don't see the purpose of God putting stars so fast and far away just so that we can have a display where no or very little (depending upon the individual and whether in a happy hour or not) motion is perceived with the eye.Neville said,"The speed of light limitation is far more of a problem in a huge universe than in a 'small' universe, but is still there, I grant you."First let me say I like this diversion. I was not enjoying at all all the "cameras in orbits." on things that nobody knows is moving. So we can keep the subject line ..
Thought I would put that in for what it's worth.
Steven
As far as I can imagine, if it is impossible for the sun to encircle the earth daily at 3.14159x 2 AU per day, Then anything up to infinity likewise. (I'm assuming I worked it out that this orbit was faster than 186000mps, ) some way back, but the principle stands even if I am wrong. I could have asked for Sirius.I see a gramaphone record spinning. Its fluid allows local systems movement. There is nothing else outside that fluid. It could be TIME. PART OF A FOUR DIMENSIONAL OBJECT.God is smart and powerful enough to do that is He not? And sections of science are already well and truly discussing this. We are just simple 3D folk.Philip
- [geocentrism] Re: For Phillip
- From: philip madsen
- [geocentrism] Re: JA's 3D diagram
- From: Allen Daves
- [geocentrism] Re: For Phillip Concave Chatter
- From: Steven Jones