[geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:41:12 +0000 (GMT)
Neville J
From Neville Jones Tue Sep 4 14:25:27 2007
Your forced, highly reserved, concession is of little value, but at least it is
some progress towards any form of genuine debate.
I realised as I wrote it that it is a pretty 'stiff' concession. However, if I
were to ask you to make such an admission about something which you believe to
be pretty much proven, solid as the rocks under your feet, I suspect that you
would be similarly un-malleable. Something like, "Are you absolutely certain
that under any circimstance, water cannot be made to participate in the process
of combustion?", simply -- water won't burn. You see, I don't think you would
want me to lie to you or to compromise my integrity. As I've said several times
here, if I am presented with verifiable contra evidence on any matter, I would
be obliged to review my position. If the contra evidence were shown to be
incontrovertible, I would be obliged to abandon my position. If, in addition to
the latter, I were presented with incontrovertible evidence that your position
were true, then I would additionally be obliged to join your camp. Are you
prepared to make this
statement also?
If you really do have something interesting on your Super 8 reels, then I would
be very careful to avoid railway crossings. Unless, of course, you view the
odds that an author and his wife and daughter were just unlucky to be hit by a
train on such a crossing, miles from anywhere, and that all copies, even
distributed ones, of his 500-page report into the goings-on at NASA prior to
Apollo 11, would naturally evaporate of their own accord, as being close to
unity.
My films are one of many copies sold by a local broadsheet newspaper
contemporary with the event. I've little doubt there were many thousands --
probably millions world wide -- sold to the general public. I've not heard that
NASA is trying to call back all these copies -- you'd think there would have
been a ripple in the pond wouldn't you? And who is this un-named author? Are
you testing me again?
Have you seen those two items I mentioned in my last post (this thread) yet?
Paul D
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage.
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- From: j a
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- » [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science
- From: j a