[geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
- From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 13:35:47 +0000
Dear Paul,
Turning them upside -down and changing left to right made all the
difference to seeing a convex comet. The comet has a very pronounced
bulge towards you.
The way to view stereo photos without a stereo viewer is to stare with
eyes unfocussed. Imagine that you are sitting in a comfy armchair not
thinking about anything in particular and just staring. You will be
aware that you you may feel that you are cross-eyed because you are
seeing two images. This is because your eyes are looking ahead to
infinity. This allows your eyes to be as far apart as they can be - the
opposite to cross-eyed. Once you aware of being able to do this then all
you need to then do is place your eyes far enough away for the two
photos to be centred on your unfocussed eye centre line i.e. the
distance between the centres of the photos need to match the distance
between your eyes. The images of the comet are too large to view at your
desk; you need to stand a least 4 - 5 feet away. The old Victorian
viewer used two lenses to cause your eyes to be parallel. Does all this
make sense Paul?
Jack
Paul Deema wrote:
Jack L
As I drifted off to sleep after my post last night this thread, I
realised that a 3D dual image wouldn't work at 90 or 270 deg rotation.
I'm surprised you needed to do left-to-right after 180 deg rotate though.
I can't get it to look like a 3D -- I can't get the images
superimposed so I don't know what it would look like to me -- innie or
outie. Just another one of life's little failures I guess. |[:-)
Paul D
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address
<http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail/?p1=ni&p2=general&p3=tagline&p4=other>.
- References:
- [geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
- From: Paul Deema
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Comet Wild 2 photos
- » [geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
- » [geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
- » [geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
- » [geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
- » [geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
Jack LAs I drifted off to sleep after my post last night this thread, I realised that a 3D dual image wouldn't work at 90 or 270 deg rotation. I'm surprised you needed to do left-to-right after 180 deg rotate though. I can't get it to look like a 3D -- I can't get the images superimposed so I don't know what it would look like to me -- innie or outie. Just another one of life's little failures I guess. |[:-)
Paul D ------------------------------------------------------------------------Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address <http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail/?p1=ni&p2=general&p3=tagline&p4=other>.
- [geocentrism] Re: Comet Wild 2 photos
- From: Paul Deema