[geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:33:39 -0800

Dear Regner,

You are clearly a scholar and a gentleman.

(Or should that be, a gentleman and a scholar? Perhaps they are equivalent? Let's not start that again!)

On a serious note, I greatly appreciate your comments.

Best wishes,

Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com


-----Original Message-----
From: art@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:18:13 +1100

Dear Neville,

What a pleasant surprise - And a very graceful end to this part of our
discussion - We'll see whether I succeed to convince Allen.

I very much appreciate that you took the time for mindful consideration of
the topic. If we all followed your example, we could probably save a lot
of time and frustrations. I, for one, have been too rash a few times.

I'm looking forward to, hopefully soon, go ahead with that list
of top 5 points in support of a geocentric Universe.
If anybody still wants to add entries, I think it'll still be a bit
before we can close the "Celestial Poles" issue. And remember, that
a HC claim that you find ludicrous and for which the only reasonable
alternative is GC, also counts as a point in support of GC.

Best wishes,

Regner

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Quoting Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>:

>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I respected Regner's request not to immediately respond to his last posting,
> but instead have been giving this whole matter very careful consideration.
>
> There is now no doubt in my mind that the 24-hour images about the ecliptic
> polar axis are always going to be snapshots of the diurnal rotation in the
> heliocentric model and I concede, therefore, that the celestial poles
> argument does not disprove the heliocentric model.
>
> Steven and my web site will be amended in the near future, God willing, to
> reflect this retraction.
>
> I would just like to thank you all for some excellent debating and for the
> many illustrations that several of you have provided. I hope that none of you
> feel that your efforts were either wasted or unappreciated.
>
> This topic will not be closed yet, since Allen has not had a chance to fully
> digest Regner's post. If he concedes, as I have, then we will close it off,
> otherwise he will now have one more to convince!
>
> I hope that our little forum family is strengthened by this discussion and
> that each one of us has learnt something from it, I know that I have. If,
> however, anyone feels disappointed, then I apologise to you for building your
> hopes up.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neville
> www.GeocentricUniverse.com
>
>
>


Other related posts: