[geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:22:03 -0000
Not so Philip, The two Roberts and their GWW is full of them. We have lost this
particular argument and must now put this one to bed. Perhaps we can call upon
Regner to address Robert Sungennis' original 1st point and those posted by
other's.
It has been a spirited debate with Regner and I congratulate him on his
analytical skills. Interestingly the celestial poles argument was well in
progress before Regner's participation; he just got caught up in it before he
had an opportunity to take on our other arguments. I sincerely hope that he
stays with the forum. I am currently trying to get another heliocentrist, who
is also a committed Christian, to return to the forum and take part.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:48 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
No apology needed Neville.. We all are responsible for building up our own
expectations. I think it was myself who first suggested stopping the world and
taking a picture every day. It took me a long time to work out how that would
not happen, even after Regners explanations. Now we have the problem of
finding another argument.. LOL
Philip.
Other related posts:
