[geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles

Not so Philip, The two Roberts and their GWW is full of them. We have lost this 
particular argument and must now put this one to bed. Perhaps we can call upon 
Regner to address Robert Sungennis' original 1st point and those posted by 
other's. 

It has been a spirited debate with Regner and I congratulate him on his 
analytical skills. Interestingly the celestial poles argument was well in 
progress before Regner's participation; he just got caught up in it before he 
had an opportunity to take on our other arguments. I sincerely hope that he 
stays with the forum. I am currently trying to get another heliocentrist, who 
is also a committed Christian, to return to the forum and take part.

Jack
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: philip madsen 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:48 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles


  No apology needed Neville.. We all are responsible for building up our own 
expectations. I think it was myself who first suggested stopping the world and 
taking a picture every day. It took me a long time to work out how that would 
not happen, even after Regners explanations.  Now we have the problem of 
finding another argument.. LOL  

  Philip.

Other related posts: