[geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:48:16 +1000
No apology needed Neville.. We all are responsible for building up our own
expectations. I think it was myself who first suggested stopping the world and
taking a picture every day. It took me a long time to work out how that would
not happen, even after Regners explanations. Now we have the problem of
finding another argument.. LOL
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Neville Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 10:51 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Celestial Poles
Dear All,
I respected Regner's request not to immediately respond to his last posting,
but instead have been giving this whole matter very careful consideration.
There is now no doubt in my mind that the 24-hour images about the ecliptic
polar axis are always going to be snapshots of the diurnal rotation in the
heliocentric model and I concede, therefore, that the celestial poles argument
does not disprove the heliocentric model.
Steven and my web site will be amended in the near future, God willing, to
reflect this retraction.
I would just like to thank you all for some excellent debating and for the
many illustrations that several of you have provided. I hope that none of you
feel that your efforts were either wasted or unappreciated.
This topic will not be closed yet, since Allen has not had a chance to fully
digest Regner's post. If he concedes, as I have, then we will close it off,
otherwise he will now have one more to convince!
I hope that our little forum family is strengthened by this discussion and
that each one of us has learnt something from it, I know that I have. If,
however, anyone feels disappointed, then I apologise to you for building your
hopes up.
Best wishes,
Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.6/1150 - Release Date: 24/11/2007
5:58 PM
- Follow-Ups:
- [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- From: Jack Lewis
- References:
- [geocentrism] Celestial Poles
- From: Neville Jones
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- » [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- From: Jack Lewis
- [geocentrism] Celestial Poles
- From: Neville Jones