[geocentrism] Re: Calendar query
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:55:42 +1000
Cheryl, hold it.. Carl did not slam the KJV. Read him again. If you hold to the
KJV against all other modern bibles OK but surely you do not make the ancient
Hebrew and Greek scripts to which Carl is making comparisons, to be false?
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Cheryl
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 10:56 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Calendar query
I thought we weren't allowed to discuss KJV-only. How come it's okay to
make slams against KJV-only, but not to reply to the slams?
So Carl, if you don't believe God has preserved HisWord in the KJV, do you
believe He's preserved it ANYWHERE? If you do, would you be so kind as to
point me to where that would be? If I've missed it, I'd like to know where
it is.
Thanks.
Cheryl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Felland" <cfelland@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:10 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Calendar query
>A friend of mine wrote:
>
> In studying any Bible topic we need to realize that we must take all of
> what the Scriptures say on the subject, and not just pull one verse out
> of its context...many people holding to a 72 hour entombment...either
> ignore, intentionally or unintentionally, what the rest of the Bible has
> to say on the subject. They [may] seem to do an excellent job in
> declaring why they hold to their position, but rarely (and even then in
> a limited fashion) does one deal with the rebuttals given by the
> opposing side... It is almost impossible to even speak to them at
> times. [The 72 hour entombment proponents remind me of those who hold
> the KJV only belief.]
> Remember, I'm talking from the perspective on having been there one year
> ago.
>
> Really folks, I have read Jonah 1:17 and Matthew 12:38-40 in the KJV.
> If Matthew 12: 40 ended with "so shall the Son of man be three days and
> three nights in the tomb" you would have a point. But, it does not!
>
> Carl
>
>
> Dr. Neville Jones wrote:
>
>>Allen, Carl,
>>
>>I have decided that this issue is extremely relevant to geocentrism, so
>>please keep your discussions open to us all.
>>
>>The Scriptures do say that the sign will be Christ's placement in a
>>memorial tomb for three days and three nights, as Allen and I have pointed
>>out -
>>
>>(Jonah 1:17 KJV) Now the LORD had prepared a great fish to swallow up
>>Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.
>>(Mat 12:38-40 KJV) Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees
>>answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered
>>and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a
>>sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet
>>Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly;
>>so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the
>>earth.
>>
>>- so we do need to reach a concensus and an understanding of how this fits
>>in with the Biblical calendar.
>>
>>Best wishes,
>>
>>Neville.
>>
>>
>>Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Carl,
>>
>>I usually try to avoid these conversations as they tend to become endless
>>debates among academics. However, I will just say that the scripture is
>>clear ,plain & it is easily understood with out any difficult reading, if
>>you accept it the same way that you might " the Sun Stood still". I will
>>not continue this here, as you are right. We will just take away from this
>>forum. I would be happy to discuss it with you otherwise.
>>
>>Allen
>>Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>.
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
