[geocentrism] Re: Calendar query

  • From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:40:30 -0400

Hi Carl,

This idea is also covered at
http://midnightcryministries.com/ThreeDays.htm

The chief objection is that the phrase would be "three nights and three
days".

RIP, JPII

Robert


> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Carl Felland
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:53 AM
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Calendar query
>
>
> I agree, and offer another idea for a secondary fulfillment of Matthew
> 12: 40.
> Night One      Betrayal by Judas/14th of Aviv
> Day One         Day of Crucifixion/14th of Aviv
> Night Two      1st night in tomb/15th of Aviv
> Day Two      1st day in tomb/15th of Aviv
> Night Three        2nd night in tomb/16th of Aviv
> Day Three         Morning of the 16th of Aviv
>
> Carl
>
> Robert Bennett wrote:
>
> >Here's another solution that makes sense.
> >
> >"three days and three nights", in Jewish terminology, did not necessarily
> >imply a full period of three actual days and three actual nights as in
> >modern English, but was simply a First Century colloquialism
> used to cover
> >any part of the first and third days.
> >The expression was always used with an equal number of days and nights; x
> >days and x nights, as though for emphasis.
> >
> >Full discussion at:
> >http://www.answering-islam.org.uk/Gilchrist/jonah.html#three
> >
> >
> >RIP, JPII
> >
> >Robert
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>[mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Cheryl
> >>Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 5:39 PM
> >>To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Calendar query
> >>
> >>
> >>I'm putting up an article on this subject that seems to have sensible
> >>answers to everything -- namely that the crucifixion occurred in
> >>AD 31 when
> >>there were two Sabbaths.  The only reason this question would be
> >>important
> >>to answer is that precise conformance to prophecy and accuracy of
> >>the Bible
> >>is at stake.  I have no doubts about either.  I'm sure there's a correct
> >>explanation for what might appear to be a discrepancy.  I'm not
> >>sure which
> >>it is, but the one below seems to make sense.
> >>Cheryl
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


Other related posts: