[geocentrism] Re: Aether effects

Correct Neville, and its just another support for my contention that you cannot 
call it a fluid, or substance or attribute to it any physical properties, such 
as wind, etc, which sent michelson, morley, einstein et al, down the wrong 
corridor. 

But perhaps Allen was speaking of synominousness, not being quite couragious 
enough to coin a new word...for the analogy of fluid viscoscity in the aether.. 
 arrr. errr  how about aetherage, or aethoricity...  As I said, who knows how 
far science would have advanced had it chosen the aether for serious 
consideration ..  rather than a hypothetical Newtonianism.. 

Philip. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dr. Neville Jones 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 7:31 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aether effects


  Allen,

  If the aether has a viscosity, then why do celestial objects that move 
through the aether not slow down?

  Neville.


  Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    A spun up flywheel that stops takes less energy to bring back up to the 
previous rpm then the energy required to bring it to that rpm initially, as 
long as that is done within a limited time frame....does it matter what the fly 
wheel is made of? In any case that time multiplied by the entropy = efficiency 
or rate of energy transfer or we could say the viscosity of the aether to that 
ordinary matter... Viscosity(aether) / Apparent motion or gravitational rate 
should yield the necessary possibilities for the frequency of gravity itself. 
The fact that the gravitational rate will be the same regardless of the 
strength of gravity of more massive/volumous bodies indicates that gravity is a 
function of vibrations.where the rate/ frequency of those vibrations stays the 
same but whose strength will be determined by the mass and size of a body in 
question...low frequencies push high frequencies shock. This hold true even in 
the everyday world. Therefore the frequency for gravity must be a low frequency 
as compared to ordinary matter in space. The wave form must be at least longer 
then the most massive clustering of bodies in space if the distribution of 
matter is due to gravity. At least ~128 million parsecs or 420 million light 
years from crest to crest the difficulty is that the source should be located 
at the center not the peripheral unless either gravity is not responsible for 
the overall structure ( ie ..structure do solely to a crystal lattice) and or a 
peripheral source could somehow create interference patterns as we observe in 
the matter distribution. If due to crystalline structure rather then vibrations 
then the frequency should still be able to be extrapolated from just viscosity 
of the aether and the gravitational rate. That in turn should allow us to by 
trial and error reproduce the observed distribution of mass and or correct for 
the errors in distance, since the distance maps should have some degree of 
accuracy even if just in terms of proportions or distance ratios between 
bodies. The fact that the maps all show a fractal structure which can only be 
explained in a ordered harmonic universe in contrast to the assumed isotropic 
randomness expected my MS indicates that the maps have some degree of accuracy 
if in nothing more then the relative distances between the bodies not 
necessarily the actually distances to the bodies. It might even allow us to 
produce more accurate distance maps.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it 
now.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.7/771 - Release Date: 21/04/2007 
11:56 AM

Other related posts: