Correct Neville, and its just another support for my contention that you cannot call it a fluid, or substance or attribute to it any physical properties, such as wind, etc, which sent michelson, morley, einstein et al, down the wrong corridor. But perhaps Allen was speaking of synominousness, not being quite couragious enough to coin a new word...for the analogy of fluid viscoscity in the aether.. arrr. errr how about aetherage, or aethoricity... As I said, who knows how far science would have advanced had it chosen the aether for serious consideration .. rather than a hypothetical Newtonianism.. Philip. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dr. Neville Jones To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 7:31 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aether effects Allen, If the aether has a viscosity, then why do celestial objects that move through the aether not slow down? Neville. Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: A spun up flywheel that stops takes less energy to bring back up to the previous rpm then the energy required to bring it to that rpm initially, as long as that is done within a limited time frame....does it matter what the fly wheel is made of? In any case that time multiplied by the entropy = efficiency or rate of energy transfer or we could say the viscosity of the aether to that ordinary matter... Viscosity(aether) / Apparent motion or gravitational rate should yield the necessary possibilities for the frequency of gravity itself. The fact that the gravitational rate will be the same regardless of the strength of gravity of more massive/volumous bodies indicates that gravity is a function of vibrations.where the rate/ frequency of those vibrations stays the same but whose strength will be determined by the mass and size of a body in question...low frequencies push high frequencies shock. This hold true even in the everyday world. Therefore the frequency for gravity must be a low frequency as compared to ordinary matter in space. The wave form must be at least longer then the most massive clustering of bodies in space if the distribution of matter is due to gravity. At least ~128 million parsecs or 420 million light years from crest to crest the difficulty is that the source should be located at the center not the peripheral unless either gravity is not responsible for the overall structure ( ie ..structure do solely to a crystal lattice) and or a peripheral source could somehow create interference patterns as we observe in the matter distribution. If due to crystalline structure rather then vibrations then the frequency should still be able to be extrapolated from just viscosity of the aether and the gravitational rate. That in turn should allow us to by trial and error reproduce the observed distribution of mass and or correct for the errors in distance, since the distance maps should have some degree of accuracy even if just in terms of proportions or distance ratios between bodies. The fact that the maps all show a fractal structure which can only be explained in a ordered harmonic universe in contrast to the assumed isotropic randomness expected my MS indicates that the maps have some degree of accuracy if in nothing more then the relative distances between the bodies not necessarily the actually distances to the bodies. It might even allow us to produce more accurate distance maps. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.7/771 - Release Date: 21/04/2007 11:56 AM