[geocentrism] Re: Aether effects

Sorry Neville, I was under the impression you considered the firmament as a 
type of aether.  But in any case, havn't we also established that consensus is 
no proof...?

Philip. 

From: Dr. Neville Jones 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 8:40 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aether effects


  Since I, for one, do not accept the existence of the aether (not yet anyway), 
it would appear that Paul is correct when he says that, "there are no two among 
you who agree on any aspect of this alleged phenomenon."

  Neville.


  philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Greetings all
    Now that the Aether Effects debate seems to have subsided, may I make an 
observation? From my reading of the various posts, I now believe I understand 
why my many entreaties for information on this subject have gone unanswered -- 
there are no two among you who agree on any aspect of this alleged phenomenon.
    Paul D
    So!  Not so..  We all agree in its existence..  But in any case, havn't we 
also established that consensus is no proof...?

    Philip. 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it 
now.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/779 - Release Date: 28/04/2007 
3:32 PM

Other related posts: