[geocentrism] Re: Aether effects

Allen,
   
  If the aether has a viscosity, then why do celestial objects that move 
through the aether not slow down?
   
  Neville.
  

Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    A spun up flywheel that stops takes less energy to bring back up to the 
previous rpm then the energy required to bring it to that rpm initially, as 
long as that is done within a limited time frame....does it matter what the fly 
wheel is made of? In any case that time multiplied by the entropy = efficiency 
or rate of energy transfer or we could say the viscosity of the aether to that 
ordinary matter??? Viscosity(aether) / Apparent motion or gravitational rate 
should yield the necessary possibilities for the frequency of gravity itself. 
The fact that the gravitational rate will be the same regardless of the 
strength of gravity of more massive/volumous bodies indicates that gravity is a 
function of vibrations?where the rate/ frequency of those vibrations stays the 
same but whose strength will be determined by the mass and size of a body in 
question??.low frequencies push high frequencies shock. This hold true even in 
the everyday world. Therefore the frequency for gravity
 must be a low frequency as compared to ordinary matter in space. The wave form 
must be at least longer then the most massive clustering of bodies in space if 
the distribution of matter is due to gravity. At least ~128 million parsecs or 
420 million light years from crest to crest the difficulty is that the source 
should be located at the center not the peripheral unless either gravity is not 
responsible for the overall structure ( ie ..structure do solely to a crystal 
lattice) and or a peripheral source could somehow create interference patterns 
as we observe in the matter distribution. If due to crystalline structure 
rather then vibrations then the frequency should still be able to be 
extrapolated from just viscosity of the aether and the gravitational rate. That 
in turn should allow us to by trial and error reproduce the observed 
distribution of mass and or correct for the errors in distance, since the 
distance maps should have some degree of accuracy even if just in
 terms of proportions or distance ratios between bodies. The fact that the maps 
all show a fractal structure which can only be explained in a ordered harmonic 
universe in contrast to the assumed isotropic randomness expected my MS 
indicates that the maps have some degree of accuracy if in nothing more then 
the relative distances between the bodies not necessarily the actually 
distances to the bodies. It might even allow us to produce more accurate 
distance maps.

       
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit now.

Other related posts: