[geocentrism] Re: Aether effects

Most aethereal thinking has been done by others.
 A net force on an object only results when there is an aether flow
inbalance across its surface.
Matter absorbs aether energy, converts it to heat, producing the hot
interior of the earth ?..  MS says this is a radioactive decay effect?..
What a joke, MS.

Suggest you research Le Sage theory of pushing gravity,  which derives the
inverse square law of attraction and gives formula for near space
corrections.
http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&v%3Asources=webplus&query=
le+sage+gravity
<http://clusty.com/search?input-form=clusty-simple&v%3Asources=webplus&query
=le+sage+gravity>

The Edwards book on Pushing Gravity is excellent.
http://www.metaresearch.org/publications/books/PushingG.asp

Chapter 12 of GWW (fabp) surveys various options, but doesn?t commit to any
(too early in the research phase)
????.
The geostat sat was explained in a prior post.  We observe that:
*       The aether moves objects westerly when at the Moon?s distance or
beyond(far space), with increasing speed with increasing distance.
*       The aether moves objects easterly for LEOs(near space), with increasing
speed with decreasing distance.

There must be a zone between the Moon and the LEOs where the aether flow
reverses direction and cancels out to zero. Aether motion produces the
forces of gravity and inertia. The cancelled aether is stagnant; in this
geostationary zone there is no aether flow to push the satellite.   Being in
free fall,  it doesn?t move. It needs no support, because there?s no aether
flow to do the pushing.

Robert

Could I ask those of you who advocate an aether to supply your thinking as
regards what effect the aether would have on material bodies (planets,
satellites, gas molecules in the atmosphere, or whatever).

I ask this because it seems to me that the aether cannot support (pun
intended) the geosynchronous satellite.

Neville.

Other related posts: