[geocentrism] Re: Aether effects
- From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:30:24 +0100 (BST)
In green :
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Me in blue
Planets, stars, the Sun and the Moon are all moving not only with but through
the aether, yet the movements of the heavens are like clockwork. There is no
slowing down of these objects.
I think you you looking at this backwards...If you take a steel rod and force
it through a orange you can do that........ but if every thing observed were
equivalent to pushing a rod through a orange then there would be no way to
distinguish this from anything else because that is/ would be the normal
resistance to all mechanics observed. We could theorize about what the orange
is made of and what the nature of the force we are using is but at the end of
the day it would just be normal with no metric by which to evaluate that force
. Now take that rod and put it in a drill and cause it to spin it will go
through the orange a little more readily..only now do we a point of reference
from which to establish any meaningful measure of the force required in our
everyday mechanical exercise. You can measure the natural resistance because
you would have nothing to measure its against however in the DePalumer and
Aspden motor we can see that the addtiona of spin makes pathways
though the aether and can be explained/ correlate to at least some ordinary
fluid /hydro-dynamic process.....Take a spinning rod place it in a liquid and
spin at high velocity then disconnect the rod such that the rod free
floats,,now the rod will eventually come to a standstill but there is still a
vortex of water that won?t have enough force to spin the rod but will enable
less force to be use to get the rod spinning again...this is experimentally
reproducible and easily understood..now as for the Moon and stars they are
travailing with the aether why would there be any resistance to the aether such
that it would cause them to slow down or act like anything other then Clock
work ? If a fluid is spinning or in motion a object will travel with it now
some objects are smaller and denser while others are more massive but just as
in the case of any river if you observe all objects in it do not travel at the
same speed but neither do they all come to a stop because of the
resistance to the water...I think you are looking at it backwards..
The objects in a river are all flowing in the same way as the river. Planets,
for example, are not always flowing in the same way as the aether, but often
against it.
As for your example of the clockwork orange, I do not follow your reasoning.
The resistance is there for sure but what you measure is something that
causes less resistance such as a spinning object in the river not some
resistance to the river that will eventually cause the objects to come to a
stop or slow down....the currents and wave forms in the river have far more
force in them then the water in a stagnate pond...There is resistance in both
the river water and pond water but the resistance can really only be observed
and measured in terms of change in motion within the river or pond because tho
objects in it are travailing with it. The only resistance that can be measured
is the observed fact that some objects do move faster then others Moon sun
stars.. .......However, even in a pond that is perfectly still a small boat
will drift almost indefinitely if pushed
No, I not not think that it will. Please explain the physics behind your
assumption of the continual drifting of the boat.
until such time as some wave form created by its relative movement to the
edge of the pond or some other object in the pond reflects back to eventually
cause it to stop but the waves created by also allow it to resume with less
force the initial force needed ..There is nothing new or different
here......GRAVITY pushing waves!
Furthermore, when I was associated with firing powerful lasers directly up
through the atmosphere, I noticed no such tendency of light to deviate from its
initial direction (other than random refraction of course).
As for lasers they are disturbed in a measurable e-w direction way just as
laser light is disturbed in a measurable way via a flowing river ( you can
detect the direction of the river)but the direction of the beam itself is not
altered if it originates in the water just as the direction of a beam is not
altered in the aether.
You are talking of the Arago effect of light going through glass, water,
etc., which is completely different. Where is the evidence that light is bent
with any form of E-W bias?
Neville.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for
your freeaccount today.
Other related posts:
