[geocentrism] Re: Aether effects

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:59:19 -0700 (PDT)

The aether is the medium for certain effects particularly waves such as 
electromagnetic as well as "gravity". Those waves directly affect the bodies in 
the aether. The aether need not "so much" affect the bodies of Mass itself 
directly. The waves travailing in the aether do affect the bodies directly as 
in the case of light is affected by the aether medium and the photo electric 
effect or a radiometer is a physically observed affect of physical mass 
affected by light/ wave form but the aether that passed the light along itself 
does not directly cause the mass to rotate.see attached jpeg.....aether drift I 
would argue is really just a unaccounted for harmonic(s) or set of harmonic 
waves due to the interactions & or disturbance of the standing waves in the 
immediate area due to other masses ....in this way a component of something 
akin to surface tension could be produced..take the sound board with sand on it 
the sand particles react to the either they must they are "Embeded"
 into the aether but to rotate the table of sand on it or around a central body 
would not necessarily not cause the objects to rotate with the aether itself 
only those objects that are "set" into the aether would rotate with the aether 
The other objects are merely affected by the standing wave forms in the aether 
or the change in harmonics caused by the other objects that are "set" into the 
aether. The satellite trajectories and Geosats are in effect not being pulled/ 
dragged by the aether itself but rather they are affected and must work against 
the standing wave forms travailing in the aether but not the aether itself. 
Those rotating wave forms about the earth with the aether cause gravity, cause 
the tides, cause fractal distribution of the masses on concentric shells. The 
gravity waves travels with the aether and orbits the earth with the rest of the 
cosmos. It does and is in-fact responsible for the squeezing of the earth at 
it?s bulges but not the aether itslef. The
 aether is only the medium for those waves, where the waves are the driving 
force for all observed movement of mass within the aether. The only exception 
is universal expansion the same way that if wee took a flexible sound board and 
stretched it in all directions while it was vibrating.. The overall pasterns 
would be the same but in that case where the "attraction" as due to the 
vibrations themselves and not the flexible sound board medium, on the other 
hand stretching of the flexible membrane would be the cause of any outward 
motion and not the vibrations.. This is why the earth has stable/ livable 
weather where the other bodies with comparably dense atmospheres have 
inhospitable weather since the earth is central to all the standing waves in 
the aether which affect the center of all that movement the least, just as in 
the case of the "eye" of a hurricane . Out in space is very violent where here 
on earth the center and "eye" of it all and is relatively calm. Mass can
 move within the aether but only as a function of the force applied to it (ie 
other physical mass contact) and the wave form(s) acting on it. In this way God 
"set" things in the firmament and they can?t move or change vectors,... how 
could you without a force to cause movement/change in the vector in the first 
place,...... all movement is or can be equivocated in terms of harmonic effects 
& or harmonic effects on a object artificially set in motion from earth ie 
satellites... As for inertia it is not a force but rather the result of the 
lack of any force to cause change in position or speed within the aether...We 
are limited but not entirely restricted in our abilities to produce force that 
can move the bodies from their "God given"set positions ie meteorites... And 
every object in space is "set" but it is affected by the standing waves/ 
harmonics in the aether, although some more then others. Ie..such as light does 
affect comet trails and applies force on comets
 trajectories but so does the gravity wave but these are two different wave 
forms and the net force applied to a comet from a light wave is not as strong 
as one from the gravity wave(s). In short it is the waves travailing in the 
aether that produce the apparent effects of motion(s) and gravity, the motions 
and the trajectory paths of all objects in the aether not the aether itself. 
The Aether is just the medium for all the various wave forms. The only 
exception to this might be the very very massive objects/ a mass threshold that 
could be theoretically "tuned" to the resonate frequency of the aether itself 
that may physically preclude any movement not tied to the aether itself 
directly...ie the stretching of the heavens... . Note: all objects in space 
will vibrate and have a natural frequency. Again only those objects that are 
"set" into the aether would rotate with the aether and the other less 
massive/volumous objects are merely affected by their trajectories against the
 standing wave forms travailing in the aether and the disturbances of those 
wave forms caused by the other more massive/ volumous objects such as planets & 
stars as in the case of the sand on the sand board. The other objects will 
affect how any one given object will behave because it is affected by the wave 
forms and it in turn will affect how the waveform affects other nearby 
bodies... As for "gravity" this could also be a indication that the 
gravitational wave form is a very very very very low frequency. Perhaps the 
lowest possible frequency the universe can carry which might be a wave form 
half the size of the universe itself...? I belive the Aether is a varible sea 
of standing and other wave forms.


"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:     Back to scientific issues.
   
  Could I ask those of you who advocate an aether to supply your thinking as 
regards what effect the aether would have on material bodies (planets, 
satellites, gas molecules in the atmosphere, or whatever).
   
  I ask this because it seems to me that the aether cannot support (pun 
intended) the geosynchronous satellite.
   
  Neville.
    
---------------------------------
  Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up 
for your free account today.

image/pjpeg

Other related posts: