## [geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing

• From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:24:01 -0800 (PST)

```YES :-)

Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Allen,
Are you are saying that the annual star trails for a given star will be
larger / smaller than the same star in the nightly trail. This is because it
will be seen in two different positions depending on which axis is the
reference. Is that correct?

Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 6:20 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing

Suplimental....

Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Blue
Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:     DIV {   MARGIN: 0px  }
Allen D
The camera is NAILED to the plank.OK
It does NOT spin. OK
The plank slides around the Sun on the plane of the ecliptic.
The camera points to the ecliptic pole.
In one year the camera will have moved radially through 360 deg.YES
Pictures taken whenever you feel the need to bleed your hydraulic system when
overlaid WILL show an annual set of concentric star trails composed of randomly
spaced dots and centred on the ecliptic pole. that set of concentric star
trails  will not appear the same as the nightly.......that is the point!.....if
they do not appear the same as the nightly then HC is untennable becuse what we
observe in nature are identical nightly and annual.....What don't you
understand?

IF it were centered on the cliptic pole each star would produce a differnt
size trail becuse the size of the trail is dependent upon the distance of the
star from the axis in this case the ecliptic verses the celestial......ther is
no way the two can be the same thus no way to argue that HC is tennable.
Because, what we observed in reality is no difference between nightly and
annual star trails....the star trails cannot be centered on both axis
simoltaniously and produce the same size trail for each star all at the same
time.............

What don't you understand?
Paul D

```