[geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing

  • From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:19:38 -0000

Dear Allen,
Are you are saying that the annual star trails for a given star will be larger 
/ smaller than the same star in the nightly trail. This is because it will be 
seen in two different positions depending on which axis is the reference. Is 
that correct?

Jack
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Allen Daves 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 6:20 PM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing


  Suplimental....

  Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

    Blue
    Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
      Allen D
      The camera is NAILED to the plank.OK
      It does NOT spin. OK
      The plank slides around the Sun on the plane of the ecliptic.
      The camera points to the ecliptic pole.
      In one year the camera will have moved radially through 360 deg.YES
      Pictures taken whenever you feel the need to bleed your hydraulic system 
when overlaid WILL show an annual set of concentric star trails composed of 
randomly spaced dots and centred on the ecliptic pole. that set of concentric 
star trails  will not appear the same as the nightly.......that is the 
point!.....if they do not appear the same as the nightly then HC is untennable 
becuse what we observe in nature are identical nightly and annual.....What 
don't you understand? 

      IF it were centered on the cliptic pole each star would produce a 
differnt size trail becuse the size of the trail is dependent upon the distance 
of the star from the axis in this case the ecliptic verses the 
celestial......ther is no way the two can be the same thus no way to argue that 
HC is tennable. Because, what we observed in reality is no difference between 
nightly and annual star trails....the star trails cannot be centered on both 
axis simoltaniously and produce the same size trail for each star all at the 
same time.............

      What don't you understand?
      Paul D

Other related posts: