[GeoStL] Re: really small caches
- From: "Laura D" <festive@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 20:14:03 -0600
-
I'm guessing he meant to say RGS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bridget Griffin
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 7:56 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: really small caches
>
>
> -
> What is GRS?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Sims" <yutty_666@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 6:26 PM
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: really small caches
>
>
> > -
> >
> > Some of the GRS caches I have found are freakin' tiny.
> >
> >
> > I think micro covers them well enough.
> >
> > Just my opinion though.
> >
> > Andy (Yutty)
> >
> > --- Glenn <Glenn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > -
> > > I am not sure what they would be called. As long as
> > > they can hold a log
> > > sheet or scroll, i would call it a cache.
> > >
> > > glenn
> > >
> > > At 04:53 PM 1/3/2004, Timothy Hunt wrote:
> > >
> > > >-
> > > >I have some containers that are small. I mean
> > > really small. I mean, could
> > > >probably fit 4 or 5 into a 35mm film cannister.
> > > Waterproof too :) Is there
> > > >an accepted term for such things? nanocache maybe
> > > :)
> > > >
> > > >I just have to find some places to hide them :)
> > > >
> > > >Timothy
>
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
****************************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
Subject field
Other related posts:
