- me and lildevil were at the jon's first and i could feel the container but it would not come out.we didnot log it cause we never signed it.if that was the case i would have more to log that i found but couldn't get to.pntball the most dangerous caches we have been to so far is budder upper and titus hollow.found a trilobyte fossil at titus hollow the picture is posted on my log but you have to find it i won't tell you where it is.pntball --- Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - > This sounds like a group cache.. hehehehe :-) > > I think you should log this if you actually saw the > container. I have thought long and hard about this > and most people are right. If a person is honest > then they will stick to their ethics and a log > should be in order. If a person is just out there to > rack up numbers, then they will do that regardless. > > I would log it as a find. I would not go back. If no > one responds to the location to move it and interest > drops off, then perhaps it will be archived > anyways.. > > Cache on! > > Mike > The Brawny Bear > > > ---------- Original Message > ---------------------------------- > From: Michael Chambers <michaelc@xxxxxxxxx> > Reply-To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:11:04 -0600 > > >- > >Various members wrote: > > > >> > >>I think it's up to the cache owner to say if you > can log it. What cache was it? > >>T.P.&M. > >> > >>if I don't sign the log I don't log it as a find. > ....... If the cache is in a dangerous spot I do > think the owner should be contacted. > >>Elkie > >> > >>Logging the find is up to you .... sounds like you > legitamately found it to me. Please let the owner > know of the situation, he might want to remove it. > I would want to know about it before going there. > >>Georgie > >> > >>I'd like to know which cache it is so I can avoid > going there. I'd say go ahead and log it just as > you would do some of the other public caches like > those in the zoo. It's definitly one I would not go > to. > >>Barramus > >> > >>IMHO, if you found it (and you did) you should log > it. I'd rather have someone do what you did than to > log it and show others where the cache is. If it is > not a big deal to come back when you can sign it, > you should. I see no problem with logging it if you > actually spot the container. > >> > >>Jim Bensman > >> > >>........you could have people logging caches that > they thought they saw when in actuality it was never > near. There is no way to ever know if they truly > found the cache. I think that that is part of the > challenge. To remove this would jeopardize the > integrity of the game. ......I feel that you could > return with someone to finish the cache. > >>Mike > >> > >>......you have asked a very good question that has > concerned me. Recently there was a cache that I > went to twice ( Jon's First Cache). I did not log it > as a find, because I did not retrieve it and sign > the log. I have also read posts that say they only > found part 1 of a multi-cache, but chose to log it > anyway, because they felt part 2 was missing? > .......others have posted finds, but said they > didn't have a pen to sign the log. I think each > person has to set their own standards and live with > it. I am only competing with myself. > >>John R - > >> > >>The kind of people who would log a cache as you > suggest will do it anyway and they would not ask a > group for advice. I don't log caches I don't sign or > find physically but if the situation arose where it > was dangerous to log it as is suggested in the > previous email and the cache had been seen just not > removed and logged in I would say "Yes go ahead and > log a find". > >>Dan (Thunder) > >> > >>I have had to go back to several caches more than > once to make it "right". > >>gln > >> > >>I bet it is that stinking Party Cove cache. I > just know it is. > >>gln > >> > >>Ya can't "reply" while on digest mode. > >>Barramus > >> > >Very excellent responses to my request for your > advise. I thank you all > >for your thoughts. I'll try to respond briefly. > >I did immediately email the cache owner with a copy > of my note to the > >List, and with a complete detailed description of > the exact cache > >location, so he (or she) could confirm that I did > indeed find it. I > >also asked them to move it. And yes, I actually > did see the cache > >itself. If I hadn't, I wouldn't have posed the > question with you all. > > I too went back twice to Jon's First, and know > that I found its hiding > >place, but I couldn't reach it either, so I didn't > log it - and I won't. > > Integrity and a strong code of personal ethics are > extremely important > >to me. If the owner contacts me and agrees that I > did find it, I'll > >think about logging it. There's a good chance that > I'll go back (mayby > >early on a cold morning - with my brother with me) > to make another > >attempt to actually log it, but I'll feel much > better about that if the > >owner moves it to a safer location. At first, I > had no intention of > >naming the cache, but several people have asked > which one it is - and > >have expressed a concern to avoid it, so I have > decided to let you all > >know that it is indeed the Carondelet cache (Sorry > Glen, it's not "that > >stinking Party Cove cache".). Oh! And yes, > Barramus, you can "reply" > >while on digest mode. It just takes a lot of > considerate editing to > >eliminate all the repetive BS. > > > >Thanks again, > >Leanman (Mike Chambers) > > > > > **************************************************************************** > > Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com > > Mail List Info. > > > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > > > The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but > this is what is there. > >The SLAGA E-store > http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA > >**************************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > **************************************************************************** > Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com > Mail List Info. > > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching > > The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but > this is what is there. > The SLAGA E-store > http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA > **************************************************************************** > > > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com **************************************************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs but this is what is there. The SLAGA E-store http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=SLAGA ****************************************************************************