[GeoStL] Re: Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- From: Joe Taylor <rockey_f_squirrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
That is very interesting. I work in a Aluminum/Magnesium Die Casting Foundry,
so I know how easy it is for wood and stuff to catch on fire around molten
metal. And Aluminum only melts around 1300*. Iron takes well over 2000* to
melt down.
Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.rockinghamremembered.com/CoalTrain.html
Mike
Joe Taylor
IS IT FRIDAY YET?
Check out my NEW Web Page
Favorite GC - Stories and Adventures
Rockey the Flying Squirrell
What is Geocaching? - What is Geocaching (In case you are not in the Geocaching
Mailing Groups)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- References:
- [GeoStL] Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- From: Mike Griffin
Other related posts:
- » [GeoStL] Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- » [GeoStL] Re: Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- » [GeoStL] Re: Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- » [GeoStL] Re: Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- » [GeoStL] Re: Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- » [GeoStL] Re: Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- [GeoStL] Why Caches Shouldn't be on RR Bridges.
- From: Mike Griffin