[GeoStL] Re: Using accurate coordinates

  • From: "KnotSoClever" <_rnx_@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:43:48 -0400

-
well said :)

------ Original Message ------
Received: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:28:59 AM EDT
From: "k Sneed" <sneed14@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Using accurate coordinates


Part of the Geocaching Creed mentioned earlier:
 
...Minimize My and Others' Impact on the Environment
  • Obtain the best possible coordinates for your cache to reduce unwarranted wear on the area. Recheck and correct your coordinates if finders report significant errors.
This point wasn't brought up last week during the discussion regarding accurate coordinates. 
 
I have seen micros hidden in woods with log after log saying the coordinates are 50-60 feet off.  When you go to hunt those caches, you can tell everyone's coord (except the actual cache) were in the same spot. Then a 50-60 foot area is totally trampled and torn up. This is contrary to "leave no trace" and a good reason for having accurate coordinates.  Obviously, depending on what type of an area the cache is hidden in, the impact could be less or more.  A pavilion cache, for example, may have coord that just "take you to to the pavilion and now find it".  However, in an area where many people hunting will have an impact, "leave no trace" ethics would dictate the use of as accurate coordinates as possible.


**************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw

Other related posts: