I'd let the log stand. Seems like a reasonable explanation. Perhaps he's physically impaired -- and he seems to be honest about what he's doing. Tom ________________________________ From: Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: SLAGA List <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sun, May 8, 2011 9:47:08 PM Subject: [GeoStL] To delete or not to delete...opinions? Hey all. Some of my caches were found by this person today and all the logs were pretty much like this. I understand some containers can be a pain for some people, but still. So...should I just take this as it is or just delete the logs? What would you personally do? -Michael Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Geocaching" <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Date: May 8, 2011 3:07:13 PM CDT >To: mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [LOG] Owner: XXXXXXX found "Doctor, Doctor!" - Columbia #5 >(Traditional >Cache) > > You are receiving this email because you are the owner of this listing. > >Location: Missouri, United States >jsmtech found "Doctor, Doctor!" - Columbia #5 (Traditional Cache) at 5/8/2011 > >Log Date: 5/8/2011 >Figured a Sunday morning would be a good time to make a run at the Doctor, >Doctor caches. Nice and quiet with no muggles around. I didn’t sign the log. > These little guys are hard for me to handle and I always worry about dropping >the cap and losing it, so once I had discovered the container I replaced it >and >moved on. Thanks for placing these! Good fun! >