[GeoStL] Re: [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- From: GC-RGS <gc-rgs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:40:36 -0500
>So much for tonight's meaningless rant. Please, tune in again tomorrow night
>when I bring you "People >who go through the '12 item or less' lane with 13
>items..."....
>Barbara
I think the people with 13 or more items must be named "Les" since the sign
says "12 items or Less".
----- Original Message -----
From: BARBARA Hunt
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:11 PM
Subject: [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
>> Subject: [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
I can appreciate the discussion on when to use SLAGA, GeoStl, etc., and each
probably has its appropriate time and place. However, I claim newcomers
syndrome when I ask why the subject tag changed from the nice, compact "GeoSTL"
to "St. Louis Area Geocachers"? I can't see most of the subject line in my mail
program! If we're signed up to the list, then we probably know what "GeoSTL"
is. I feel so much better, now that I have that off of my chest. :)
So much for tonight's meaningless rant. Please, tune in again tomorrow night
when I bring you "People who go through the '12 item or less' lane with 13
items..."....
Barbara
- References:
- [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- From: BARBARA Hunt
Other related posts:
- » [GeoStL] Re: [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- From: BARBARA Hunt